News:

While the Forum is up and running, there are still thousands of guests (bots). Downtime may occur as a result.
- Alex

Main Menu

How many interstates in the state you live in?

Started by STLmapboy, January 03, 2021, 09:56:16 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

STLmapboy

In Missouri, there are 18 interstate highways. This puts us 7th in the nation (behind NC, TX, IL, NY, OH, and PA). Not too shabby.

2di (9):
29
35
44
49
55
57
64
70
72

3di (9):
155
170
229
255
270
435
470
635
670

I've been on 11 of the 18 in my state.



Teenage STL area roadgeek.
Missouri>>>>>Illinois


bassoon1986

13 in Louisiana. 6 are 2dis and 7 are 3dis


iPhone

SkyPesos

#2
I'll take this as an opportunity to try to name all the interstates in my state off my head. I've been on the ones bolded

2di:
70, 71, 74, 75, 76, 77 (concurrency with 76), 80, 90 (8)

3di:
270, 470, 670
271, 471
275, 475, 675
277
280 (for the sole reason to drive on a bridge), 480 (concurrency with 271), 680
490 (13)

Total: 21, been on 18

Edit: Removed 276, marked the ones I've been on

oscar

In Virginia:

64, 66, 77, 81, 85, 95

264, 464, 564, 664, 381, 581, 195, 295, 395, 495

Total of 16.
my Hot Springs and Highways pages, with links to my roads sites:
http://www.alaskaroads.com/home.html

Buck87

Quote from: SkyPesos on January 03, 2021, 10:11:55 PM
I'll take this as an opportunity to try to name all the interstates in my state off my head

2di:
70, 71, 74, 75, 76, 77, 80, 90 (8)

3di:
270, 470, 670
271, 471
275, 475, 675
276
277
280, 480, 680
490 (14)

Total: 22

You almost got it.

We have 21 (8 2di and 13 3di).

There's no I-276 in Ohio.

SkyPesos

#5
Quote from: Buck87 on January 03, 2021, 10:16:01 PM
Quote from: SkyPesos on January 03, 2021, 10:11:55 PM
I'll take this as an opportunity to try to name all the interstates in my state off my head

2di:
70, 71, 74, 75, 76, 77, 80, 90 (8)

3di:
270, 470, 670
271, 471
275, 475, 675
276
277
280, 480, 680
490 (14)

Total: 22

You almost got it.

We have 21 (8 2dia and 13 3di).

There's no I-276 in Ohio.
I just realized that right before I reloaded the page and saw your response lol. Don't know where I got 276 from.

Also are we like one of the few states with a lot of 3di, but no odd hundred digit ones? I noticed that when writing out my list. Though 562 would look nicer by adding 9 and making it I-571 with a red and blue shield, but that's fictional territory

Ben114

2di:
84, 90, 91, 93, 95

3di:
190, 290, 291, 391, 195, 295, 395, 495

13 total

gonealookin

Nevada gained two signed interstates in the 2010s, an increase of 50% in the decade!

I-11 (first shields posted in 2017)
I-15
I-80
I-215
I-515
I-580 (first shields posted in 2012)

Ketchup99

I'll try PA from memory:

79 (279, 579), 99, 81, 83 (283), 95 (295), 70, 76 (176, 276, 376, 476, 676), 78, 80 (180, 280, 380), 86, 90

So 23, unless I'm missing any, which I probably am.

thspfc

Eight. Half of them are very controversial in one way or another. People here think I-39 has two many multiplexes. They think I-41 is useless, or should be a 3di . . . is there even reasoning at all? (spoiler: there's not) I-894 is double-multiplexed its entire length. I-794 faced major opposition at the time it was built.

SkyPesos

Quote from: thspfc on January 03, 2021, 11:15:42 PM
Eight. Half of them are very controversial in one way or another. People here think I-39 has two many multiplexes. They think I-41 is useless, or should be a 3di . . . is there even reasoning at all? (spoiler: there's not) I-894 is double-multiplexed its entire length. I-794 faced major opposition at the time it was built.
I place the blame for the 2di Wisconsin's interstate controversies at IDOT. The midwest grid breakers I-41 and I-43 should've been an extension of 55, 57 or 65 since day one; guess who doesn't want to cooperate ;)

Great Lakes Roads

#11
I'll take a shot of Indiana's interstates.

2di's: 64, 65, 69, 70, 74, 80, 90, 94

3di's: 164, 265, 275, 465, 469, 865

So, we have 8 mainline interstates and 5 (formerly 6) auxiliary interstates. That's a total of 13 interstates (formerly 14) in Indiana.

Edit to add:
I'll take a shot on Illinois's interstates as well.

2di's: 24, 39, 41, 55, 57, 64, 70, 72, 74, 80, 88, 90, 94

3di's: 155, 172, 180, 190, 255, 270, 280, 290, 294, 355, 474, *490*

So, Illinois has 13 mainline interstates and 11 (12 by 2025) auxiliary interstates. That's a total of 24 interstates (25 by 2025) in Illinois.
-Jay Seaburg

Crown Victoria

Quote from: Ketchup99 on January 03, 2021, 11:05:00 PM
I'll try PA from memory:

79 (279, 579), 99, 81, 83 (283), 95 (295), 70, 76 (176, 276, 376, 476, 676), 78, 80 (180, 280, 380), 86, 90

So 23, unless I'm missing any, which I probably am.

You have the total number correct (23), but you missed I-84, and there's no I-280 currently in PA.

corco


cl94

Please note: All posts represent my personal opinions and do not represent those of my employer or any of its partner agencies.

US 89


Max Rockatansky

Too many, California went way overboard with non-chargeable 3ds.

sprjus4

Since Virginia was already posted, here's the next closest - North Carolina.

This list includes current and future (not currently signed) routes. Combined, 9 mainline interstate highways, 14 auxiliary interstate highways, for a total of 23 interstate highways across the state.

I-26, I-40 (I-140, I-240, I-440, I-540, I-840), I-42, I-73, I-74 (I-274), I-77 (I-277), I-85 (I-285, I-485, I-785, I-885), I-87 (I-587), I-95 (I-295, I-795)

FrCorySticha

Montana is easy: 3 2di, 2 3di

2di: I-15, I-90, I-94
3di: I-115, I315

Caps81943

I'll just go ahead and try VA from memory for fun.

2di: 95-64-66-81-77 Future: 74-87-73

3di: 581-781-381-495-395-264-295-664-464-164-564

Let's see how I did.

2di: Drat, I forgot 85!

3di: Forgot 195, no 164, no 781. TIL a 785 is planned.

All in all 6 2di + 10 3di = 16 total, with three more in the future (2 2di and 1 3di)

jp the roadgeek

#20
CT is pretty quick

2di: 84, 91, 95

3di: 291, 384, 395, 684 (thought I'd forget, didn't you :biggrin:), 691

So 3 2di and 5 3di = 8.  But for most purposes, we count 7.

Former/Once proposed (to be built or numbered):

82: An old working number for 84 to Providence
86: Many of us know about it. East Hartford-Sturbridge section of I-84 and was to connect to I-91 via extended CT 3 expressway
87: The original number for I-684
284: A proposed highway parallel to US 5 as an extension of CT 2
290: The number once proposed for the northern half of I-395.
484: Once was proposed for the Conland-Whitehead Highway when it was to extend under Bushnell Park
491: Another number used for the CT 3 expressway and extension to I-84 in East Hartford
495: Would have come here if one of the Cross Sound Bridge options that used it was built.
Interstates I've clinched: 97, 290 (MA), 291 (CT), 291 (MA), 293, 295 (DE-NJ-PA), 295 (RI-MA), 384, 391, 395 (CT-MA), 395 (MD), 495 (DE), 610 (LA), 684, 691, 695 (MD), 695 (NY), 795 (MD)

TheStranger

#21
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on January 03, 2021, 11:38:04 PM
Too many, California went way overboard with non-chargeable 3ds.

Let's see if I can remember off the top of my head:

I-5: I-105, I-205, (I-305), I-405, I-505 originally planned as I-5W, I-605, I-805.  FUTURE: 905.   FORMER: I-105 (unsigned) along US 101 segment of Santa Ana Freeway
(future I-7 or whatever Route 99 is planned to be numbered as if that ever is upgraded to Interstate)
I-10: I-110, I-210, I-710.  FORMER: I-110 (unsigned) along San Bernardino Freeway between US 101 and I-5
I-15: I-215 formerly known as I-15E
I-40
I-80: I-280, I-380, I-580 (formerly I-5W), I-680, I-780, I-880, I-980.  FORMER: I-480, original I-880 in Sacramento.

17 currently signed, 1 unsigned, and one 3di and one potential 2di that could be signed in the future.  6 former designations (I-5W, I-15E, I-480, original I-880, original I-105, original I-110).

EDIT:  I forgot one, and it's the most hilariously obvious one in retrospect. 

I-238!  Makes that 18 currently signed.

Also, today's I-580 between San Rafael and Albany (the former Route 17) was provisionally designated as I-180, but never signed, around 1981.  (It was shown on the Rand McNally atlas of the time).  Does this count?

ALSO I did forget two more from LA.
Chris Sampang

jp the roadgeek

Quote from: TheStranger on January 04, 2021, 12:51:01 AM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on January 03, 2021, 11:38:04 PM
Too many, California went way overboard with non-chargeable 3ds.

Let's see if I can remember off the top of my head:

I-5: I-105, I-205, (I-305), I-405, I-505 originally planned as I-5W, I-605, I-805.  FUTURE: 905. 
(future I-7 or whatever Route 99 is planned to be numbered as if that ever is upgraded to Interstate)
I-10: I-110, I-210, I-710
I-15: I-215 formerly known as I-15E
I-40
I-80: I-280, I-380, I-580 (formerly I-5W), I-680, I-780, I-880, I-980.  FORMER: I-480, original I-880 in Sacramento.

17 currently signed, 1 unsigned, and one 3di and one potential 2di that could be signed in the future.  4 former designations (I-5W, I-15E, I-480, original I-880).

Love how you (intentionally?) left off everybody's favorite CA interstate :bigass:
Interstates I've clinched: 97, 290 (MA), 291 (CT), 291 (MA), 293, 295 (DE-NJ-PA), 295 (RI-MA), 384, 391, 395 (CT-MA), 395 (MD), 495 (DE), 610 (LA), 684, 691, 695 (MD), 695 (NY), 795 (MD)

TheStranger

Quote from: jp the roadgeek on January 04, 2021, 12:52:47 AM
Quote from: TheStranger on January 04, 2021, 12:51:01 AM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on January 03, 2021, 11:38:04 PM
Too many, California went way overboard with non-chargeable 3ds.

Let's see if I can remember off the top of my head:

I-5: I-105, I-205, (I-305), I-405, I-505 originally planned as I-5W, I-605, I-805.  FUTURE: 905. 
(future I-7 or whatever Route 99 is planned to be numbered as if that ever is upgraded to Interstate)
I-10: I-110, I-210, I-710
I-15: I-215 formerly known as I-15E
I-40
I-80: I-280, I-380, I-580 (formerly I-5W), I-680, I-780, I-880, I-980.  FORMER: I-480, original I-880 in Sacramento.

17 currently signed, 1 unsigned, and one 3di and one potential 2di that could be signed in the future.  4 former designations (I-5W, I-15E, I-480, original I-880).

Love how you (intentionally?) left off everybody's favorite CA interstate :bigass:

LOL, it was not intentional!  Not at all!  And I've been on 238 many many many times, I just forgot. LOL
Chris Sampang

TheHighwayMan3561

7. Or 8. Or 9. Everybody's got their own opinion and they're all wrong.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.