Regional Boards > Central States
North Dakota
webny99:
That is to a SPUI as a folded diamond interchange is to a regular diamond interchange (in other words, it's as much a SPUI as a folded diamond is a diamond, which is not at all), although I can kind of see what they're going for.
TheHighwayMan394:
Grand Forks and East Grand Forks, MN officials are looking into the feasibility of a new Red River crossing, with their current preference being a continuation of 32nd Avenue South. However there is no existing road on the Minnesota side to tie into, so that would be just one of the obstacles faced.
https://www.grandforksherald.com/news/local/east-grand-forks-city-council-members-hear-update-on-consultant-hiring-process-for-intercity-bridge
https://www.grandforksherald.com/news/local/east-grand-forks-city-council-members-discuss-benefits-of-a-potential-bridge-on-32nd-avenue-south
Revive 755:
--- Quote from: Great Lakes Roads on March 29, 2022, 01:42:27 PM ---This concept reminds me of the one that was recently modified to this exact style in West Fargo: https://www.google.com/maps/@46.8499675,-96.9077514,17z
--- End quote ---
Those look more like a continuous green-T/partial cloverleaf hybrids than modified SPUIs.
The lack of a second signal for the Sheyenne Street example for exiting traffic where it crosses the left turn seems questionable. There's never going to be any vehicles exiting eastbound that enter the first intersection during the later half of the yellow light and fails to clear the second intersection before the left turn onto WB I-94 gets a green or flashing yellow arrow?
SD Mapman:
--- Quote from: TheHighwayMan394 on April 12, 2022, 08:41:15 PM ---Grand Forks and East Grand Forks, MN officials are looking into the feasibility of a new Red River crossing, with their current preference being a continuation of 32nd Avenue South. However there is no existing road on the Minnesota side to tie into, so that would be just one of the obstacles faced.
https://www.grandforksherald.com/news/local/east-grand-forks-city-council-members-hear-update-on-consultant-hiring-process-for-intercity-bridge
https://www.grandforksherald.com/news/local/east-grand-forks-city-council-members-discuss-benefits-of-a-potential-bridge-on-32nd-avenue-south
--- End quote ---
I mean I would just extend 190th St SW a bit south to meet it at the river, seems pretty logical.
The Ghostbuster:
One thing about North Dakota I find fascinating is the fact that Interstate 94 had sequential exit numbers until the early 1990s (they converted to mileage-based around 1993, by my estimation). Did Interstate 29 also have sequential exit numbers? If so, it had to have been converted before Interstate 94's exit numbers were.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version