Thanks to everyone for the feedback on what errors you encountered from the forum database changes made in Fall 2023. Let us know if you discover anymore.
Quote from: kkt on Today at 12:56:37 PMThose are awfully small traffic volumes to be worth doing anything at all. I-11 at all is mostly for suburban Phoenix real estate development, I-11 north of Las Vegas is a complete waste. There are plenty of highway projects that really need doing - bridges and viaducts that will fall down in the next big earthquake, fracture critical bridges that also have lower overhead clearance than current interstate standards, urban area freeways that could really use an HOV lane. Yes, higher gas taxes would be justified, but whether the gas tax is raised or not spending money on I-11 north of Las Vegas is absurd.
Quote from: gonealookin on April 18, 2024, 08:51:56 PMI lived in Hayward, CA when the quake hit the Bay Area in October 1989, and lived in Alameda before that, so I was on the Cypress Viaduct (CA 17, then I-880) a fair amount before that thing came down in the quake. Also the old Embarcadero Freeway in S.F. (didn't actually collapse in the quake but was damaged to the point it had to be closed, and never reopened before being torn down).I was visiting a friend in Hayward during the Loma Prieta earthquake. The Saturday before the Tuesday temblor, she took me up to Napa Valley for a winery tour, and we took a route that had us nearing the MacArthur Maze, where we got stuck in the wrong lane and ended up heading for the Bay Bridge rather than north on 80/580 toward Napa. So we bailed at the exit prior to the toll plaza, crossed the old Oakland Army Base, and rejoined the freeway on the lower deck of the I-880 Nimitz Freeway. I recall at the time thinking how I would not like to be stuck on that double-deck structure during a quake (premonition, perhaps?), though the particular section we traversed did survive a little over 3 days later. The major collapse occurred a little further to the south, along Cyprus Street (now Mandela Parkway).
When I was first driving, Carquinez Scenic Drive (briefly US 40 way back when) between Martinez and Port Costa was still open to vehicular traffic, so I drove that once or twice. Not quite a "disaster" but it closed due to landslides around 1982 and was never reopened. It's now a multi-use recreational path within an East Bay regional park.
Quote from: paulthemapguy on Today at 03:53:19 PMMNDOT could take a similar approach as that found on I-405 in Bellevue, Washington, for example. Left exits from the bus lane up to the surface street would be expensive, but it sounds like there would only be a few of them. https://maps.app.goo.gl/ycivXMygTLLsrdE3A
Quote from: paulthemapguy on Today at 03:53:19 PMTo have no physical barriers between freeway traffic and bike/ped traffic sounds wildly unsafe. In some of this, I'm sensing some Phase I folks who are 100% theory and 0% pragmatism. Dreams of transportation equity are fine and all, but they should be rolled out in a way that enables safety and serves travel demand. We don't need bikes/peds on every single traveled way. Give the bikes/peds something robust, but parallel to I-94, rather than directly on the freeway!
Generally, equity is providing conduit to serve travel demand to all modes for as many trips as possible. It isn't about turning every single segment of trafficway into something that serves all imaginable modes.
Quote from: froggie on May 19, 2024, 11:59:38 PMhttps://www.wcax.com/2024/05/17/vtrans-officials-still-bullish-notch-road-barriers/
Earlier this month, VTrans installed temporary chicanes on each end of the VT 108 Smuggler's Notch stretch, in order to prevent the notorious event of trucks getting stuck in the Notch and closing the road for hours at a time as they are unstuck, removed, and ticketed (over $2K for the first offense) by authorities.
The Notch opened to traffic last week. But within 48 hours, a truck driver dodged the chicane on the Cambridge side and got stuck. I had a hunch this was going to happen after seeing the first photos of the chicane...too easy for trucks to skirt into the opposing lane. VTrans has more work to do to figure out a better solution.