News:

While the Forum is up and running, there are still thousands of guests (bots). Downtime may occur as a result.
- Alex

Main Menu

Does your state still have roadside emergency call boxes?

Started by Pink Jazz, August 18, 2014, 02:30:26 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Pink Jazz

With most people now having cell phones, many states have removed most of their roadside emergency call boxes.  I was wondering, does your state still have them?

Here in Arizona, the few that remain seem to be located on rural, non-interstate highways.  I presume the reason for keeping them in those areas is due to weak cell phone coverage.


US71

Quote from: Pink Jazz on August 18, 2014, 02:30:26 PM
With most people now having cell phones, many states have removed most of their roadside emergency call boxes.  I was wondering, does your state still have them?

Here in Arizona, the few that remain seem to be located on rural, non-interstate highways.  I presume the reason for keeping them in those areas is due to weak cell phone coverage.
Arkansas never had them, but the Prairie Grove phone booth is back in action ;)
Like Alice I Try To Believe Three Impossible Things Before Breakfast

jeffandnicole

The PA Turnpike is mandated to keep them.  There was a story in the Philly Inquirer not too long ago about that. 


Brandon

The only part of Illinois that had them was Metro East (St Clair & Madison Counties).  Chicagoland has never had them as far as I know.
"If you think this has a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention." - Ramsay Bolton, "Game of Thrones"

"Symbolic of his struggle against reality." - Reg, "Monty Python's Life of Brian"

Rainking75

Massachusetts used to have them on I-91 for the whole length through the state, and I believe I-495 had them as well.

cl94

New York did (and may still) have them every two miles along I-87 in the Adirondacks between Exits 26 and 35. To my knowledge, they have never worked, but the 2006 improvements to the system may have fixed that. This area was a dead zone until pretty recently, as a few nasty accidents north of Exit 30 put political pressure on the Adirondack Park Agency to allow cell towers along state highways.
Please note: All posts represent my personal opinions and do not represent those of my employer or any of its partner agencies.

PHLBOS

Quote from: Rainking75 on August 18, 2014, 03:55:42 PM
Massachusetts used to have them on I-91 for the whole length through the state, and I believe I-495 had them as well.
I-95 between the RI State Line and Canton had them as well as I-93 from roughly Woburn to the NH State Line.
GPS does NOT equal GOD

Eth

I haven't been down that way in a couple years, but as far as I know, Georgia's I-185 still has them.

vdeane

Quote from: cl94 on August 18, 2014, 05:14:44 PM
New York did (and may still) have them every two miles along I-87 in the Adirondacks between Exits 26 and 35. To my knowledge, they have never worked, but the 2006 improvements to the system may have fixed that. This area was a dead zone until pretty recently, as a few nasty accidents north of Exit 30 put political pressure on the Adirondack Park Agency to allow cell towers along state highways.
They were still there when I was last on the road in 2012.
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

doorknob60

The only place I recall seeing them recently is California. They're all over the place down there.

pctech

I haven't seen any here (Louisiana) since the 90's or so I think.

english si

The UK (which has a much better cell phone coverage on main roads than the US in general - due to main roads not being as remote) is still using them, even upgrading them and putting new ones when widening motorways.

roadman

Quote from: english si on August 19, 2014, 07:40:59 AM
The UK (which has a much better cell phone coverage on main roads than the US in general - due to main roads not being as remote) is still using them, even upgrading them and putting new ones when widening motorways.
This is likely because the UK also has very strict laws restricting the use of cellphones while driving.
"And ninety-five is the route you were on.  It was not the speed limit sign."  - Jim Croce (from Speedball Tucker)

"My life has been a tapestry
Of years of roads and highway signs" (with apologies to Carole King and Tom Rush)

Rainking75

Quote from: PHLBOS on August 18, 2014, 05:19:41 PM
Quote from: Rainking75 on August 18, 2014, 03:55:42 PM
Massachusetts used to have them on I-91 for the whole length through the state, and I believe I-495 had them as well.
I-95 between the RI State Line and Canton had them as well as I-93 from roughly Woburn to the NH State Line.

Forgot about the ones on I-95 and I-93. Now I'm wondering if there were any on I-190 or I-195...

SSOWorld

California still has them and (I think) they still work.  Though they are mostly on the freeways - urban and rural. Any cell phone call to 911 in CA is answered by the CHP

Wisconsin - never had em.
Scott O.

Not all who wander are lost...
Ah, the open skies, wind at my back, warm sun on my... wait, where the hell am I?!
As a matter of fact, I do own the road.
Raise your what?

Wisconsin - out-multiplexing your state since 1918.

roadfro

Nevada never had a whole lot of call boxes. There's a couple on US 50, between Lake Tahoe and Carson City that have been there for a while. NDOT installed a bunch as part of a widening project along I-15 between the California state line/Primm and the south end of the Las Vegas Valley back in the mid 2000s--the spacing emulates those seen in California. Other than those examples, I can't think of any more in Nevada at all.
Roadfro - AARoads Pacific Southwest moderator since 2010, Nevada roadgeek since 1983.

hotdogPi

The ones on I-93 were removed not because of people using cellphones, but because there was a time that they didn't work, resulting in someone's death. (Saying any more would give away who I am.)
Clinched

Traveled, plus
US 13, 50
MA 22, 35, 40, 53, 79, 107, 109, 126, 138, 141, 159
NH 27, 78, 111A(E); CA 90; NY 366; GA 42, 140; FL A1A, 7; CT 32, 320; VT 2A, 5A; PA 3, 51, 60, WA 202; QC 162, 165, 263; 🇬🇧A100, A3211, A3213, A3215, A4222; 🇫🇷95 D316

Lowest untraveled: 36

PHLBOS

Quote from: Rainking75 on August 19, 2014, 07:08:11 PM
Quote from: PHLBOS on August 18, 2014, 05:19:41 PM
Quote from: Rainking75 on August 18, 2014, 03:55:42 PM
Massachusetts used to have them on I-91 for the whole length through the state, and I believe I-495 had them as well.
I-95 between the RI State Line and Canton had them as well as I-93 from roughly Woburn to the NH State Line.

Forgot about the ones on I-95 and I-93. Now I'm wondering if there were any on I-190 or I-195...
I-190 never had them.  OTOH, I-195 from the RI State Line to the Braga Bridge might have had them.  Call Box installations along Interstates in MA seemed to be a late 60s/early 70s thing; I-190 came well after such.
GPS does NOT equal GOD

hbelkins

Quote from: 1 on August 20, 2014, 07:48:33 AM
The ones on I-93 were removed not because of people using cellphones, but because there was a time that they didn't work, resulting in someone's death. (Saying any more would give away who I am.)

Huh?
Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

hotdogPi

Quote from: hbelkins on August 20, 2014, 11:19:13 AM
Quote from: 1 on August 20, 2014, 07:48:33 AM
The ones on I-93 were removed not because of people using cellphones, but because there was a time that they didn't work, resulting in someone's death. (Saying any more would give away who I am.)

Huh?

June 30, 2006. Someone I know had a flat tire between exits 41 and 42 on I-93 north. He couldn't get it fixed. He tried using the call boxes twice, but they didn't work (the people working for the call boxes ignored it). At 9:45 PM, someone crashed into him on the side of the road and he died. Because the call boxes did not do anything useful, they were removed.
Clinched

Traveled, plus
US 13, 50
MA 22, 35, 40, 53, 79, 107, 109, 126, 138, 141, 159
NH 27, 78, 111A(E); CA 90; NY 366; GA 42, 140; FL A1A, 7; CT 32, 320; VT 2A, 5A; PA 3, 51, 60, WA 202; QC 162, 165, 263; 🇬🇧A100, A3211, A3213, A3215, A4222; 🇫🇷95 D316

Lowest untraveled: 36

Zeffy

Quote from: 1 on August 20, 2014, 11:41:12 AM
June 30, 2006. Someone I know had a flat tire between exits 41 and 42 on I-93 north. He couldn't get it fixed. He tried using the call boxes twice, but they didn't work (the people working for the call boxes ignored it). At 9:45 PM, someone crashed into him on the side of the road and he died. Because the call boxes did not do anything useful, they were removed.

That sounds like negligent homicide to me because the call operators ignored a man who later then died. That sucks either way.
Life would be boring if we didn't take an offramp every once in a while

A weird combination of a weather geek, roadgeek, car enthusiast and furry mixed with many anxiety related disorders

Brandon

Quote from: 1 on August 20, 2014, 07:48:33 AM
(Saying any more would give away who I am.)

Bah.  We really don't worry too much about that here as we do get together from time to time.  Check out the road meet section for more.
"If you think this has a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention." - Ramsay Bolton, "Game of Thrones"

"Symbolic of his struggle against reality." - Reg, "Monty Python's Life of Brian"

jdbx

I'm not sure about other parts of California, but around the Bay Area most of the call boxes have been removed.  The poles on which they were mounted remain, with a sign posted saying to dial 511 for roadside assistance.  I think they used to have a call box every 1/4 mile, but now I would estimate the spacing to be closer to ever 1-1.5 miles.

The one and only time I attempted to use a call box, which was around 1997 on CA-4 over the Willow Pass, the thing was completely dead and useless.  I had to hike down the hill and use a pay phone (another thing that is slowly disappearing).

roadman

Quote from: 1 on August 20, 2014, 11:41:12 AM
Quote from: hbelkins on August 20, 2014, 11:19:13 AM
Quote from: 1 on August 20, 2014, 07:48:33 AM
The ones on I-93 were removed not because of people using cellphones, but because there was a time that they didn't work, resulting in someone's death. (Saying any more would give away who I am.)

Huh?

June 30, 2006. Someone I know had a flat tire between exits 41 and 42 on I-93 north. He couldn't get it fixed. He tried using the call boxes twice, but they didn't work (the people working for the call boxes ignored it). At 9:45 PM, someone crashed into him on the side of the road and he died. Because the call boxes did not do anything useful, they were removed.
MassHighway was already in the process of reviewing the need for call boxes when this happened.  All this incident did was to accellerate the removal of the call boxes from Massachusetts highways entirely.
"And ninety-five is the route you were on.  It was not the speed limit sign."  - Jim Croce (from Speedball Tucker)

"My life has been a tapestry
Of years of roads and highway signs" (with apologies to Carole King and Tom Rush)

hbelkins

#24
Quote from: 1 on August 20, 2014, 11:41:12 AM

June 30, 2006. Someone I know had a flat tire between exits 41 and 42 on I-93 north. He couldn't get it fixed. He tried using the call boxes twice, but they didn't work (the people working for the call boxes ignored it). At 9:45 PM, someone crashed into him on the side of the road and he died. Because the call boxes did not do anything useful, they were removed.

Saying that didn't do anything to reveal your identity.

--broken quote fix --sso
Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.