lowest signed summit

Started by agentsteel53, August 23, 2013, 09:37:19 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

agentsteel53

I was thinking about this today.  CA-52 has Mission Trails Summit, at a whopping 821 feet.  any summit out there lower in elevation which is given its own sign?

IIRC, Telegraph Pass on I-8 (around 450 feet) is not signed, even though it features quite a steep climb for an interstate, and even the carriageways crossing over each other.

live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com


1995hoo

#1
Jerimoth Hill, the highest point in Rhode Island (812 feet), has a sign on Route 101, although it's not at the actual "summit" because no road goes there.

Edited to add: Here's the Street View. Had to wait until I was at a PC to get the link. http://goo.gl/maps/tP9FM
"You know, you never have a guaranteed spot until you have a spot guaranteed."
—Olaf Kolzig, as quoted in the Washington Times on March 28, 2003,
commenting on the Capitals clinching a playoff spot.

"That sounded stupid, didn't it?"
—Kolzig, to the same reporter a few seconds later.

Truvelo

I like this one. A bit sad really when our highest freeway is just 1221 feet.
Speed limits limit life

mgk920

Isn't there a ridiculously low signed summit on I-75 north of Tampa, FL?

Mike

NE2

Quote from: mgk920 on August 23, 2013, 11:36:52 AM
Isn't there a ridiculously low signed summit on I-75 north of Tampa, FL?
Doubtful.
pre-1945 Florida route log

I accept and respect your identity as long as it's not dumb shit like "identifying as a vaccinated attack helicopter".

agentsteel53

I don't remember anything on any segment of I-75 offhand... maybe through the Appalachians, where the summit is 'as expected' so I didn't commit it to memory.
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

nexus73

There is a low summit sign on 126 as it passes through the Coast Range in Oregon.  I believe the altitude is in the 800's.  While that seems "silly low", when winter comes, snow levels of 500 feet get plenty of mention in weather reports so knowing the high spots, even if they are not that high, is important.

Rick
US 101 is THE backbone of the Pacific coast from Bandon OR to Willits CA.  Industry, tourism and local traffic would be gone or severely crippled without it being in functioning condition in BOTH states.

hotdogPi

In Massachusetts, there is a sign for the highest elevation on the Mass Pike, at 1724 feet. It's not as low as the others mentioned, but it's still relatively low, especially since it covers I-90 in several states.
Clinched

Traveled, plus
US 13, 50
MA 22, 35, 40, 53, 79, 107, 109, 126, 138, 141, 159
NH 27, 78, 111A(E); CA 90; NY 366; GA 42, 140; FL A1A, 7; CT 32, 320; VT 2A, 5A; PA 3, 51, 60, WA 202; QC 162, 165, 263; 🇬🇧A100, A3211, A3213, A3215, A4222; 🇫🇷95 D316

Lowest untraveled: 36

Jim

I've been on I-75 in Florida many, many times and have never noticed an elevation sign.

This one from I-84 in New York is not especially high:


Photos I post are my own unless otherwise noted.
Signs: https://www.teresco.org/pics/signs/
Travel Mapping: https://travelmapping.net/user/?u=terescoj
Counties: http://www.mob-rule.com/user/terescoj
Twitter @JimTeresco (roads, travel, skiing, weather, sports)

citrus


NE2

Quote from: citrus on August 23, 2013, 12:53:33 PM
My vote's for Rock Reef Pass on FL 9336 in the Everglades. Three feet! http://cdn.c.photoshelter.com/img-get/I0000ztOBUQXY7PE/s/650/650/everglades-rock-reef-pass-20110924-IMG-6239.jpg
Oh crap. That wins. (Technically it's not on SR 9336 - that ends at the park boundary.)
pre-1945 Florida route log

I accept and respect your identity as long as it's not dumb shit like "identifying as a vaccinated attack helicopter".

Jim

Photos I post are my own unless otherwise noted.
Signs: https://www.teresco.org/pics/signs/
Travel Mapping: https://travelmapping.net/user/?u=terescoj
Counties: http://www.mob-rule.com/user/terescoj
Twitter @JimTeresco (roads, travel, skiing, weather, sports)

1995hoo

Are there any negative elevation signs in Death Valley or around the Dead Sea? (Yeah, I know, those aren't "summits," but they'd still be interesting to see.)
"You know, you never have a guaranteed spot until you have a spot guaranteed."
—Olaf Kolzig, as quoted in the Washington Times on March 28, 2003,
commenting on the Capitals clinching a playoff spot.

"That sounded stupid, didn't it?"
—Kolzig, to the same reporter a few seconds later.

Alex

Sea level is signed along Interstate 8 in Imperial County:


myosh_tino

#14
While not quite as low as the Mission Trails Summit on CA-52, the Altamont Pass, elevation 1009 ft, is signed on I-580 east of Livermore.

Quote from: 1995hoo on August 23, 2013, 01:14:43 PM
Are there any negative elevation signs in Death Valley or around the Dead Sea? (Yeah, I know, those aren't "summits," but they'd still be interesting to see.)
There are these two from the AARoads Gallery...





The first one looks like it was put up by Caltrans.  The second sign was put up by the National Park Service.
Quote from: golden eagle
If I owned a dam and decided to donate it to charity, would I be giving a dam? I'm sure that might be a first because no one really gives a dam.

agentsteel53

I believe there is a sign somewhere for "elevation -100".  I don't think it's I-8... maybe one of the Death Valley roads?  it looks just like the Sea Level sign Alex showed.

I remember on a frontage road to I-10, one of the Indio city limit signs had elevation shown as "+/-" as opposed to a number!  this was in 2006; the sign is gone I believe.
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

Urban Prairie Schooner

Quote from: 1995hoo on August 23, 2013, 01:14:43 PM
Are there any negative elevation signs in Death Valley or around the Dead Sea? (Yeah, I know, those aren't "summits," but they'd still be interesting to see.)

There is a "sea level" sign posted on a mountainside adjacent to Badwater Basin, official lowest point in the USA - that means the sign is 282 feet above you:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/dogpics/471587160/

cpzilliacus

#17
I think this may be the lowest summit posted in Maryland, on I-70 between Frederick and Hagerstown - Braddock Mountain (part of the Catoctin Ridge) at 985 feet

But we go higher. 

I think the highest location on Maryland's Interstate system is on 68 in Garrett County, Meadow Mountain at 2780 feet (also the (for now) unsigned Eastern Continental Divide).

Opinions expressed here on AAROADS are strictly personal and mine alone, and do not reflect policies or positions of MWCOG, NCRTPB or their member federal, state, county and municipal governments or any other agency.

1995hoo

Quote from: Urban Prairie Schooner on August 23, 2013, 01:54:57 PM
Quote from: 1995hoo on August 23, 2013, 01:14:43 PM
Are there any negative elevation signs in Death Valley or around the Dead Sea? (Yeah, I know, those aren't "summits," but they'd still be interesting to see.)

There is a "sea level" sign posted on a mountainside adjacent to Badwater Basin, official lowest point in the USA - that means the sign is 282 feet above you:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/dogpics/471587160/

Neat. Must be hard to get a good picture that really shows the full area whilst getting the sign clearly. Thanks for posting that.
"You know, you never have a guaranteed spot until you have a spot guaranteed."
—Olaf Kolzig, as quoted in the Washington Times on March 28, 2003,
commenting on the Capitals clinching a playoff spot.

"That sounded stupid, didn't it?"
—Kolzig, to the same reporter a few seconds later.

hbelkins

Quote from: cpzilliacus on August 23, 2013, 07:22:36 PM
I think the highest location on Maryland's Interstate system is on 68 in Garrett County, Meadow Mountain at 2780 feet (also the (for now) unsigned Eastern Continental Divide).

It was signed the last time I was across 68, back in the spring. I usually try to snap a picture every time I pass by there, but the weather often doesn't cooperate.

Quote from: Jim on August 23, 2013, 12:12:46 PM
I've been on I-75 in Florida many, many times and have never noticed an elevation sign.

This one from I-84 in New York is not especially high:




What's hidden on that flip-down (or in this case, looks to be a flip-up) sign?
Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

xonhulu

Quote from: nexus73 on August 23, 2013, 11:58:41 AM
There is a low summit sign on 126 as it passes through the Coast Range in Oregon.  I believe the altitude is in the 800's.  While that seems "silly low", when winter comes, snow levels of 500 feet get plenty of mention in weather reports so knowing the high spots, even if they are not that high, is important.

The lowest I know of in Oregon is also in the Coast Range.  It's on OR 22 further north, and is signed as "SUMMIT COAST RANGE ELE 672" in this Street View image:

https://maps.google.com/maps?q=murphy+hill+summit+oregon+18&hl=en&ll=45.095983,-123.743984&spn=0.000994,0.002642&sll=45.049926,-123.78365&sspn=0.000494,0.001321&t=m&z=19&layer=c&cbll=45.096055,-123.743868&panoid=Pk80LM7fD9lXA3nLoPkgXw&cbp=12,214.68,,1,2.06

CNGL-Leudimin

Supporter of the construction of several running gags, including I-366 with a speed limit of 85 mph (137 km/h) and the Hypotenuse.

Please note that I may mention "invalid" FM channels, i.e. ending in an even number or down to 87.5. These are valid in Europe.

Pete from Boston

Quote from: 1 on August 23, 2013, 12:01:40 PM
In Massachusetts, there is a sign for the highest elevation on the Mass Pike, at 1724 feet. It's not as low as the others mentioned, but it's still relatively low, especially since it covers I-90 in several states.

Well, there's added significance in that it's signed as the highest point on 90 east of the Rockies.  This always felt counterintuitive to me, but the Appalachians turn far east starting in Pennsylvania, and west of the Hudson 90 follows the low "water level" route across NY, so it makes sense.

Jim

Quote from: Pete from Boston on August 30, 2013, 10:13:49 PM
Quote from: 1 on August 23, 2013, 12:01:40 PM
In Massachusetts, there is a sign for the highest elevation on the Mass Pike, at 1724 feet. It's not as low as the others mentioned, but it's still relatively low, especially since it covers I-90 in several states.

Well, there's added significance in that it's signed as the highest point on 90 east of the Rockies.  This always felt counterintuitive to me, but the Appalachians turn far east starting in Pennsylvania, and west of the Hudson 90 follows the low "water level" route across NY, so it makes sense.

At the risk of nitpicking..  Oacoma, South Dakota, where the I-90 climbs above its max elevation in the Berkshires, is very far to the east of the Rockies.

Photos I post are my own unless otherwise noted.
Signs: https://www.teresco.org/pics/signs/
Travel Mapping: https://travelmapping.net/user/?u=terescoj
Counties: http://www.mob-rule.com/user/terescoj
Twitter @JimTeresco (roads, travel, skiing, weather, sports)

Pete from Boston

Quote from: Jim on August 30, 2013, 10:27:57 PM
Quote from: Pete from Boston on August 30, 2013, 10:13:49 PM
Quote from: 1 on August 23, 2013, 12:01:40 PM
In Massachusetts, there is a sign for the highest elevation on the Mass Pike, at 1724 feet. It's not as low as the others mentioned, but it's still relatively low, especially since it covers I-90 in several states.

Well, there's added significance in that it's signed as the highest point on 90 east of the Rockies.  This always felt counterintuitive to me, but the Appalachians turn far east starting in Pennsylvania, and west of the Hudson 90 follows the low "water level" route across NY, so it makes sense.

At the risk of nitpicking..  Oacoma, South Dakota, where the I-90 climbs above its max elevation in the Berkshires, is very far to the east of the Rockies.

I am probably being loose with the details, and it sounds about right that South Dakota is the next highest point west.  I'm sure someone has a picture of the sign.




Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.