News:

The server restarts at 2 AM and 6 PM Eastern Time daily. This results in a short period of downtime, so if you get a 502 error at those times, that is why.
- Alex

Main Menu

Metric Signs

Started by KillerTux, September 14, 2010, 11:22:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

kphoger

Quote from: kphoger on July 03, 2025, 09:10:31 AMIn fact, writing a simple glissando would imply things about the run of notes that you don't actually intend to communicate to the performer
Quote from: Bickendan on July 03, 2025, 06:08:05 PMThere is also a difference between notating all the notes between the first and last note of a run vs a glissando for wind instruments. Usually a gliss will be it doesn't matter what notes in between are hit but make it as smooth as possible, smeared if possible. Notated out, it's not expected each note will be hit, but they are typically part of a specific scale, so the ones out of that scale should be avoided but the first and last notes are the important ones to hit with the ones in between being filler.

That's actually what I had in mind when I wrote that.  If any of the notes in between aren't part of that 'specific scale', then you'll have to notate all of them.  Same if any extras are included or any usual ones are omitted.

Quote from: Scott5114 on July 03, 2025, 07:52:10 PMThen again, writing a trombone part with anything faster than eighth notes is likely to make the trombonist want to lose control of the slide, and it will go flying across the room and hit you in the teeth with their slide, so maybe don't do that either.

Edited for accuracy.

He Is Already Here! Let's Go, Flamingo!
Dost thou understand the graveness of the circumstances?
Deut 23:13
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: PKDIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.


Brandon

Quote from: Scott5114 on July 01, 2025, 03:37:17 PM
Quote from: mgk920 on July 01, 2025, 12:26:05 PMWith the way things have been going recently in Canada, should some of those western provinces eventually gain independence and then join the USA . . .

With the way things have been going in America, I think it's more likely that it will have fewer states rather than more in the future.

Secession is illegal in the US, and has been since, de facto, 1865, and de jure since 1869 (and if you include the Articles of Confederation, then since 1781).  So, no, it's not likely at all.  Texas v. White: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_v._White

By contrast, Canada has an act that allows for session, the Clarity Act: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarity_Act
"If you think this has a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention." - Ramsay Bolton, "Game of Thrones"

"Symbolic of his struggle against reality." - Reg, "Monty Python's Life of Brian"

LilianaUwU

Quote from: Brandon on July 05, 2025, 06:21:27 PMBy contrast, Canada has an act that allows for session, the Clarity Act: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarity_Act

And yet, when Québec tried, Canada meddled in, and rigged, the referendum to make sure we remained in Canada.
"Volcano with no fire... Not volcano... Just mountain."
—Mr. Thwomp

My pronouns are she/her. Also, I'm an admin on the AARoads Wiki.

Scott5114

#153
Quote from: Brandon on July 05, 2025, 06:21:27 PMSecession is illegal in the US, and has been since, de facto, 1865, and de jure since 1869 (and if you include the Articles of Confederation, then since 1781).  So, no, it's not likely at all.

What the laws of the United States say only matters if the government of the United States remains a going concern. Or if the government of the United States remains able and willing to enforce them.

I'm not convinced all of those will remain true. (I'm not convinced they won't remain true, either, mind you.)

I also don't see any compelling reason any territory that is not currently part of the United States would want to become so. It would seem to create more problems for that territory than it would solve.
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

hotdogPi

A state can leave with consent of the state and a simple majority of the US House and Senate.
Clinched

Traveled, plus
US 13, 50
MA 22,35,40,53,79,107,109,126,138,141,151,159,203
NH 27, 78, 111A(E); CA 90; NY 9A, 366; GA 42, 140; FL A1A, 7; CT 32, 193, 320; VT 2A, 5A; PA 3, 51, 60, WA 202; QC 162, 165, 263; 🇬🇧A100, A3211, A3213, A3215, A4222; 🇫🇷95 D316

Lowest untraveled: 36

Scott5114

Quote from: hotdogPi on July 05, 2025, 07:14:17 PMA state can leave with consent of the state and a simple majority of the US House and Senate.

I mean, not according to the Supreme Court Texas v. White.

But the Supreme Court of 2025 just kind of makes shit up as they go, so who knows if that even applies anymore.
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

Brandon

Quote from: hotdogPi on July 05, 2025, 07:14:17 PMA state can leave with consent of the state and a simple majority of the US House and Senate.

That's for making a new state out of a current state.  I'd suggest looking again at Texas v. White.
"If you think this has a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention." - Ramsay Bolton, "Game of Thrones"

"Symbolic of his struggle against reality." - Reg, "Monty Python's Life of Brian"

vdeane

Quote from: Brandon on July 05, 2025, 06:21:27 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on July 01, 2025, 03:37:17 PM
Quote from: mgk920 on July 01, 2025, 12:26:05 PMWith the way things have been going recently in Canada, should some of those western provinces eventually gain independence and then join the USA . . .

With the way things have been going in America, I think it's more likely that it will have fewer states rather than more in the future.

Secession is illegal in the US, and has been since, de facto, 1865, and de jure since 1869 (and if you include the Articles of Confederation, then since 1781).  So, no, it's not likely at all.  Texas v. White: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_v._White

By contrast, Canada has an act that allows for session, the Clarity Act: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarity_Act
It was also illegal for the 13 colonies to secede from Great Britain.  That didn't stop it from happening.  And quite frankly, the moral and cultural gulf between the sides of the Culture Ware are so great that I don't see how the whole thing can be resolved without a national divorce (assuming one side doesn't just shove the other out of society).
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

CtrlAltDel

Quote from: Brandon on July 05, 2025, 06:21:27 PMSecession is illegal in the US, and has been since, de facto, 1865, and de jure since 1869 (and if you include the Articles of Confederation, then since 1781).  So, no, it's not likely at all.  Texas v. White: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_v._White

Texas v. White specifically mentions that the consent of the states, whatever form that might entail, affords a legal means of secession. It's really only unilateral secession that's a no-no.

QuoteThe union between Texas and the other States was as complete, as perpetual, and as indissoluble as the union between the original States. There was no place for reconsideration, or revocation, except through revolution, or through consent of the States.
I-290   I-294   I-55   (I-74)   (I-72)   I-40   I-30   US-59   US-190   TX-30   TX-6

michravera

Quote from: english si on September 17, 2010, 01:22:22 PMThe UK has almost dropped Farenheit from conversation entirely - it was quite common 10 years ago. I think when the weather only gave "that's about 80" occasionally during the summer, or "we're going to see 100 degrees for the first time in the UK today", the rest of the culture followed.

Before that it was much more of a centigrade in winter and Fahrenheit in summer - probably to make our maritime climate seem like it went to bigger extremes and the weather tended to give dual units more often.

However because the US is totally Fahrenheit for weather, it's unlikely to change there.

That's not quite correct,, Dave. FAA uses Celsius exclusively (as of about 1994). This is an improvement over Fahrenheit on the ground and Celsius in the air. It still generally uses Statue Miles (with a preference toward feet {and, occasionally meters}) on the ground and Nautical Miles in the air.


ElishaGOtis

For some reason I've never noticed this sign on I-24 despite the fact I used to LIVE near here... one of TN's classic signs that were used far more frequently back in the day.

https://maps.app.goo.gl/UWrT1ZFoVxW478Ak9

Also saw this sad sight on I-40 :( :(
https://maps.app.goo.gl/Vr1JSCS1So4cwzP68
I can drive 55 ONLY when it makes sense.

NOTE: Opinions expressed here on AARoads are solely my own and do not represent or reflect the statements, opinions, or decisions of any agency. Any official information I share will be quoted from another source.

kphoger

Quote from: michravera on September 27, 2025, 04:54:57 PMStatue Miles

I assume the definition of this unit is based on a life-seized statue of Oliver R. Smoot housed near Paris at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures.

He Is Already Here! Let's Go, Flamingo!
Dost thou understand the graveness of the circumstances?
Deut 23:13
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: PKDIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.

pderocco

Quote from: kphoger on Today at 09:52:46 AM
Quote from: michravera on September 27, 2025, 04:54:57 PMStatue Miles

I assume the definition of this unit is based on a life-seized statue of Oliver R. Smoot housed near Paris at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures.
I thought that was located in front of the ISO offices.