Highways You Have Clinched

[Rothman]

Clinched all the current 3dis in Oklahoma and St. Louis area.  Wish I-240 had been signed along Airport Road, though...

[pderocco]

Just clinched in a two-week road trip in the Western states:

    US-189, 191, 195, 491

    CO-64, 75, 90, 141, 340
    ID-11, 128
    OR-230, 273, 422
    UT-32, 35, 43, 44, 45, 46, 87, 88, 121, 123, 124, 128, 149, 157, 208, 302, 311, 319
    WA-225, 281, 285, 509 (new part), 903, 904, 971
    WY-296
    All signed Historic US-10 in WA

National Park/Monument roads

    Crater Creek Rd, Crater Lake Hwy, and Rim Dr, Crater Lake NP
    Cub Creek Rd and Harpers Corner Rd, Dinosaur NP
    East Entrance Rd, Norris Canyon Rd, and Northeast Entrance Rd, Yellowstone NP
    Fossil Butte Rd, Fossil Butte NM
    Rimrock Dr, Colorado NM

Fun roads not in Travelmapping

    Old Highway 8 (old WA-8, two pieces along Columbia River)
    Old Spiral Hwy (old US-95), Lewiston ID
    County Route A10 up to the end on Mount Shasta CA
    All unsigned old alignments of US-10 in WA, except one in downtown Seattle

Pushing consecutive coverage:

    US-30 from west end in Astoria OR to Walcott WY, clinched in OR, ID
    US-40 from west end in East Basin UT to Granby CO, clinched in UT
    US-50 from west end in Sacramento CA to Montrose CO, clinched in CA, NV, UT

[Hunty2022]

Last Friday I clinched VA-280 on a trip to the Buc-ee's in Rockingham County.

[Avalanchez71]

How about I-4 or I-24, maybe I-16.

[CoreySamson]

Finally got around to clinching the Texas section of I-69 as well as FM 361 and FM 865 today (which puts me at 27 clinched FM routes!).

[Sapphuby]

Clinched MO 27 today on a trip from Burlington. They closed the Fort Madison Bridge which let me get this clinch.

[jlam]

I just went on a clinching trip in Cheyenne, bagging:
I-180 (WY)
US 85 in WY
I-25 BL (Cheyenne)
US 87 BUS (Cheyenne)
WY 212
WY 219
WY 223

[pderocco]

I just went on a clinching trip in Cheyenne, bagging:
I-180 (WY)
US 85 in WY
I-25 BL (Cheyenne)
US 87 BUS (Cheyenne)
WY 212
WY 219
WY 223

I-180 is an interesting oddity, something any road geek should drive if in the area.

[ElishaGOtis]

Minor update to my list, but it took a lot of effort 

Interstates & US Rtes
Includes all 2dis and multi-state 3dis
I-4
I-10 [my first major 2di!!!]
I-12 (bonus: both ways)
I-14 as built 2023 (bonus: one trip)
I-22
I-24 (bonus: both directions)
I-30
I-66
I-295 DC/MD
I-395 VA/DC (per realignment)
I-495 VA/DC/MD
US-92
US-192
US-331

Texas
I-10 within state no longer applicable given I-10 now clinched in full
BL-10 Fort Stockton
SH-130 as signed only
SH-170 as built 2023
SH-183 as signed east branch
US-183 Toll
SH-225 as built 2023
SP-298
SP-366
LP-375
I-610

[ElishaGOtis]

Additional updates

Arizona
I-40 within state

Arkansas
I-40 within state
I-430
I-440

California
I-40 within state
SR-58 Business Mojave
SR-58 Business Tehachapi
SR-75
SR-126
SR-170
SR-282
I-405

New Mexico
I-40 within state

Oklahoma
I-40 within state
I-335 as built 2025 (not including 2-lane section of turnpike)

Texas
BL-10 Fort Stockton
I-40 within state
SH-130 as signed only
SH-170 as built 2023
SH-183 as signed east branch
US-183 Toll
SH-225 as built 2023
SP-298
SP-366
LP-375
I-610

[NWI_Irish96]

Finished off I-55 today, which now makes it the longest interstate I've clinched.

[NWI_Irish96]

Updated List

2di fully clinched: 8, 17, 19, 24, 39, 41, 43, 55, 57, 65, 66, 68, 69(N), 71, 72, 74(W), 76(W), 88(W), 96, 97

2di state clinches
10: MS
25: CO
30: AR
40: CA, AZ, NM, TX
44: MO
64: MO, IL, IN, KY, WV
70: CO, KS, MO, IL, IN, OH, PA, MD
75: GA, KY, OH, MI
80: NE, IA, IL, IN, OH, PA, NJ
90: WY, SD, MN, WI, IL, IN, OH, PA
94: MT, ND, WI, IL, IN, MI

3di: 110 MS, 110 CA, 155 IL, 169 KY, 170, 172, 180 IL, 190 SD, 190 IL, 194 MI, 195 RI/MA, 195 MD, 205 CA, 225, 238, 240 TN, 255, 264 KY, 265 KY, 265 IN, 270 MO/IL, 270 MD, 270 CO, 275 TN, 275 OH/IN/KY, 277 OH, 279, 280 OH, 280 IA/IL, 290 NY, 290 IL, 294, 345, 355, 380 IA, 393, 395 VA/DC, 395 MD, 395 FL, 440 TN, 465, 469, 470 OH/WV, 471, 474, 475 OH, 475 GA, 495 VA/DC/MD, 535, 579, 595 MD, 670 OH, 675 OH, 680 OH, 695 DC, 794, 795 MD, 865, 894

US Highway fully clinched: 131

US Highway State clinches:
6: IL, IN
10: MI
12: IL, IN, MI
14: IL
20: IL, IN
23: MI
24: IL, IN
27: IN
30: IL, IN
31: IN, MI
33: IN
34: IL
35: IN
36: IL, IN
40: IN
45: IL
50: IN
51: IL, WI
52: IL, IN
54: IL
136: IN
150: IN
224: IN
231: IN
421: IN

Number of state highways clinched by state:
IN: All
IL: 60
KY: 49
MI: 43
WI: 9
FL: 8
VA: 7
CO: 3
UT: 3
LA: 2
SC: 2
TN: 2
WA: 2
WY: 2
AL: 1
AZ: 1
DC: 1
MA: 1
MD: 1
NV: 1
NY: 1
OH: 1
PA: 1
VT: 1
ON: 1

Other clinched routes:
KY Audubon Pkwy
KY Western Kentucky Pkwy
MD Baltimore-Washington Pkwy
VA George Washington Pkwy
MD Suitland Pkwy
IN/IL/WI/MI Lake Michigan Circle Tour

[flan]

Finished my clinches of both ND 13 and ND 11 yesterday.

[Rothman]

Heh.  Checked to see if I by happenstance clinched all of NY 114 yesterday and I somehow missed the section between St. Mary's Road and Thomas Ave on Shelter Island.

I don't keep track of non-Interstate routes, but couldn't help to consider the possibility.

[LilianaUwU]

Finished my clinch of A-73 last Friday. New clinches in bold. Clinches that have since been voided as a result of extensions/reroutings/truncations are struck.


Ontario:

ON 417

Québec:

A-20, A-30 (Montréal segment), A-40,  A-73, A-85 (as of July 11th, 2022), A-440 (both Québec City segments), A-540, A-573, A-730, A-740, A-930, A-973, R-136 (Québec City), R-185 (as of July 11th, 2022), R-197, R-198, R-199, R-368

New Brunswick:

TCH 2, TCH 16, NB 140

Prince Edward Island:

PE 27 (retroactive clinch)

[hobsini2]

Not sure when I last updated this. As of September 2025.
Interstates: 2 digit - 4, 17, 24, 27, 30, 39, 41, 43, 44, 57, 72, 74 WEST, 76 WEST, 84 EAST, 86 EAST, 88 WEST, 99
3 digit - 215 (NV), 515 (NV), 126 (SC), 129 (NE-IA), 630 (AR), 235 (OK), 635 (TX), 255 (MO-IL), 355 (IL), 165 (KY), 465 (IN), 865 (IN), 169 (KY), 469 (IN), 270 (MO-IL), 670 (KS-MO), 172 (IL), 474 (IL), 175 (FL), 375 (FL)/(MI), 475 (GA), 180 (IL), 280 (IA-IL)/(OH)/(NJ), 380 (IA), 580 (NV), 680 (NE-IA), 880 (IA), 980 (CA), 787 (NY), 189 (VT), 190 (SD)/(IL), 290 (IL)/(MA), 194 (ND), 294 (IL), 394 (MN), 494 (MN), 694 (MN), 794 (WI), 894, (WI), 195 (RI-MA), 295 (ME), 395 (FL)/(MD)/(CT-MA)/(ME)

US Routes and State Highways to come soon.

[NWI_Irish96]

Added IL 6, IL 26, IL 84 and the IL portion of US 150 to my list today.

[XamotCGC]

Question:Is a clinching  considered no longer valid if a previous clinched highway route gets expanded upon with new road that didn't exist at the time the route was clinched?

[kphoger]

Question:Is a clinching  considered no longer valid if a previous clinched highway route gets expanded upon with new road that didn't exist at the time the route was clinched?

That's up to you, dude!

Just be prepared that, no matter what course you choose, |Rothman| will tell you it's wrong.

[Max Rockatansky]

San Benito County Roads 107 (New Idria Road) and 98 (Panoche Road/former CA 180) last weekend for me.

[pderocco]

Question:Is a clinching  considered no longer valid if a previous clinched highway route gets expanded upon with new road that didn't exist at the time the route was clinched?

I call that an "asterisk". I don't say I didn't clinch it, but I reclinch it if I'm in the neighborhood, and remove the asterisk. The only asterisk I've got right now is the new routing of CA-41 and CA-46 in Cholame, which is currently a work in progress. I'll probably not go there until the final routing is finished.

[Max Rockatansky]

Question:Is a clinching  considered no longer valid if a previous clinched highway route gets expanded upon with new road that didn't exist at the time the route was clinched?

I call that an "asterisk". I don't say I didn't clinch it, but I reclinch it if I'm in the neighborhood, and remove the asterisk. The only asterisk I've got right now is the new routing of CA-41 and CA-46 in Cholame, which is currently a work in progress. I'll probably not go there until the final routing is finished.

That's a perfect illustrative example for why I don't keep hard data on what I've driven.  That's just too much information to remember and track for such a minor alignment shift.

[pderocco]

Question:Is a clinching  considered no longer valid if a previous clinched highway route gets expanded upon with new road that didn't exist at the time the route was clinched?

I call that an "asterisk". I don't say I didn't clinch it, but I reclinch it if I'm in the neighborhood, and remove the asterisk. The only asterisk I've got right now is the new routing of CA-41 and CA-46 in Cholame, which is currently a work in progress. I'll probably not go there until the final routing is finished.

That's a perfect illustrative example for why I don't keep hard data on what I've driven.  That's just too much information to remember and track for such a minor alignment shift.

Well the minor shift isn't something that appears in the hard data that I keep, that's just something I'd be aware of even if I didn't log stuff. Nothing's changing in my TravelMapping .list file.

I've kept GPS logs for almost 20 years, and manually drawn maps in Microsoft Streets & Trips for five years before that. I do it on any major trip, any minor trip that takes me somewhere new (not counting mere streets), or any trip on which I may take pictures. When I found TM, I spent a bunch of time transcribing logs, but I find the combination of the logs and the TM data very useful in planning trips. I admit it has given me some incentive to chase down stupid little missing bits of road here and there, but I try not to care about those too much, and concentrate on major clinches, preferably of the most scenic roads.

[Max Rockatansky]

Question:Is a clinching  considered no longer valid if a previous clinched highway route gets expanded upon with new road that didn't exist at the time the route was clinched?

I call that an "asterisk". I don't say I didn't clinch it, but I reclinch it if I'm in the neighborhood, and remove the asterisk. The only asterisk I've got right now is the new routing of CA-41 and CA-46 in Cholame, which is currently a work in progress. I'll probably not go there until the final routing is finished.

That's a perfect illustrative example for why I don't keep hard data on what I've driven.  That's just too much information to remember and track for such a minor alignment shift.

Well the minor shift isn't something that appears in the hard data that I keep, that's just something I'd be aware of even if I didn't log stuff. Nothing's changing in my TravelMapping .list file.

I've kept GPS logs for almost 20 years, and manually drawn maps in Microsoft Streets & Trips for five years before that. I do it on any major trip, any minor trip that takes me somewhere new (not counting mere streets), or any trip on which I may take pictures. When I found TM, I spent a bunch of time transcribing logs, but I find the combination of the logs and the TM data very useful in planning trips. I admit it has given me some incentive to chase down stupid little missing bits of road here and there, but I try not to care about those too much, and concentrate on major clinches, preferably of the most scenic roads.

That's the rub, I don't have a TM map and starting one seems like a burden I just don't have the motivation for.  More so given that it is meant for mostly numbered highways.  I could in theory just get a really good road map for California or other affected states and use highlighters for what I've driven.  Even then, who is going to see something like that besides me?

[pderocco]

Question:Is a clinching  considered no longer valid if a previous clinched highway route gets expanded upon with new road that didn't exist at the time the route was clinched?

I call that an "asterisk". I don't say I didn't clinch it, but I reclinch it if I'm in the neighborhood, and remove the asterisk. The only asterisk I've got right now is the new routing of CA-41 and CA-46 in Cholame, which is currently a work in progress. I'll probably not go there until the final routing is finished.

That's a perfect illustrative example for why I don't keep hard data on what I've driven.  That's just too much information to remember and track for such a minor alignment shift.

Well the minor shift isn't something that appears in the hard data that I keep, that's just something I'd be aware of even if I didn't log stuff. Nothing's changing in my TravelMapping .list file.

I've kept GPS logs for almost 20 years, and manually drawn maps in Microsoft Streets & Trips for five years before that. I do it on any major trip, any minor trip that takes me somewhere new (not counting mere streets), or any trip on which I may take pictures. When I found TM, I spent a bunch of time transcribing logs, but I find the combination of the logs and the TM data very useful in planning trips. I admit it has given me some incentive to chase down stupid little missing bits of road here and there, but I try not to care about those too much, and concentrate on major clinches, preferably of the most scenic roads.

That's the rub, I don't have a TM map and starting one seems like a burden I just don't have the motivation for.  More so given that it is meant for mostly numbered highways.  I could in theory just get a really good road map for California or other affected states and use highlighters for what I've driven.  Even then, who is going to see something like that besides me?

Yes, it might be pointless to start now, given the huge number of interesting roads you've traveled that you haven't logged in the past. I wouldn't have used TM if I didn't have some sort of trip logs going back to 1991, the early ones being a highlighted AAA Atlas combined with credit card statements showing restaurants, hotels and gas purchases. But I find it fun.