News:

Cloudflare is enabled due to bots continuing to hammer the Forum.

Main Menu

I-69 in TX

Started by Grzrd, October 09, 2010, 01:18:12 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

MaxConcrete

#2975
Bids were opened this week to upgrade a 3.5-mile-long section of US 281 (I-69C) to freeway standards on the north side of the Rio Grande Valley. Specifically, from 3.9 miles north of SH 186 to 7.4 miles north of SH 186.

Looking at the plans, the existing northbound lanes will become the northbound frontage road. A new southbound frontage road will be built on the western edge of the right-of-way, and 2x2 barrier-separated (no median) main lanes will be built between the frontage roads.

Estimate: $73.9 million
Low bid: $62.1 million by IOC Company LLC


Thegeet


splashflash

Nocagdoches relief route drone flyover.  The first in 5 months.  https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oNQKXPXGTNQ

TheBox

Quote from: splashflash on May 31, 2026, 12:57:35 AMNocagdoches relief route drone flyover.  The first in 5 months.  https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oNQKXPXGTNQ
Whenever they're finally done with this and the Texarkana I-30/I-369 intersection, never let them cook anything highway related again.

2 words, development hell

That aside, it finally looks like it's almost done (like it should've been several years ago)
Wake me up when they upgrade US-290 between the state's largest city and growing capital into expressway standards if it interstate standards.

Giddings bypass, Elgin bypass, and Elgin-Manor freeway/tollway when?

CoreySamson

Quote from: TheBox on May 31, 2026, 04:58:28 AM
Quote from: splashflash on May 31, 2026, 12:57:35 AMNocagdoches relief route drone flyover.  The first in 5 months.  https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oNQKXPXGTNQ
That aside, it finally looks like it's almost done (like it should've been several years ago)
That actually does seem like decent progress for once (although where is the construction equipment in the video? I only see a crane and several other things). North end still needs quite a bit of work, but the Diboll bypass was fairly similar in that the north end lagged behind the rest of the project quite badly but ended up getting completed quickly close to the end, so I guess there's hope that contractors can wrap this up quickly. What's the ETA on this project again?
Buc-ee's and QuikTrip fanboy. Clincher of 37 FM roads. Proponent of the TX U-turn. Unabashed HAWK hater. ORU '26.

Route Log
Clinches
Counties
TM

-- US 175 --

Quote from: CoreySamson on May 31, 2026, 03:43:47 PMWhat's the ETA on this project again?

I don't remember, but I would guess the contractor has missed the target.

TheBox

#2981
Quote from: -- US 175 -- on May 31, 2026, 04:13:29 PM
Quote from: CoreySamson on May 31, 2026, 03:43:47 PMWhat's the ETA on this project again?

I don't remember, but I would guess the contractor has missed the target.

2029 being the current ETA iirc, correct me if I'm wrong

But I bet the original ETA was 2023 or 2024 before they missed the mark (I forgot the reasons why)
Wake me up when they upgrade US-290 between the state's largest city and growing capital into expressway standards if it interstate standards.

Giddings bypass, Elgin bypass, and Elgin-Manor freeway/tollway when?

CtrlAltDel

I recently drove the Diboll bypass. It's pretty solid overall, I'd say, although perhaps a bit overcomplicated at the northern end. One thing that annoyed me was that there was a pair of signs before every bridge, one on the left and the other on the right, pointing out that the bridge may ice in cold weather. They were posted even when the bridges were close together, such as here, where there were six signs within 1,500 feet, making things unnecessarily cluttered.


I-290   I-294   I-55   (I-74)   (I-72)   I-40   I-30   US-59   US-190   TX-30   TX-6

CoreySamson

Quote from: CtrlAltDel on May 31, 2026, 05:24:14 PMI recently drove the Diboll bypass. It's pretty solid overall, I'd say, although perhaps a bit overcomplicated at the northern end. One thing that annoyed me was that there was a pair of signs before every bridge, one on the left and the other on the right, pointing out that the bridge may ice in cold weather. They were posted even when the bridges were close together, such as here, where there were six signs within 1,500 feet, making things unnecessarily cluttered.



That's just Texas oversigning. There are a lot of those signs in my area, even though we get winter precipitation perhaps once every five years. At that point, why bother putting up the signs?
Buc-ee's and QuikTrip fanboy. Clincher of 37 FM roads. Proponent of the TX U-turn. Unabashed HAWK hater. ORU '26.

Route Log
Clinches
Counties
TM

The Road Warrior

Quote from: TheBox on May 31, 2026, 04:25:24 PM
Quote from: -- US 175 -- on May 31, 2026, 04:13:29 PM
Quote from: CoreySamson on May 31, 2026, 03:43:47 PMWhat's the ETA on this project again?

I don't remember, but I would guess the contractor has missed the target.

2029 being the current ETA iirc, correct me if I'm wrong

But I bet the original ETA was 2023 or 2024 before they missed the mark (I forgot the reasons why)

Current ETA is early Spring 2027. I believe you've got the end date confused with the nearby segment of U.S. 59 by US-259, which is scheduled to start construction in 2029.

Thegeet

In case I haven't said it already, US 59 main lanes in hungerford are finished and in the process of installing BGSs. I-69 signs spotted on the feeders. It's up to Wharton now (and eventually Pierce). They are installing the bare bones of the new SB bridge.