News:

Am able to again make updates to the Shield Gallery!
- Alex

Main Menu

PennDOT and concrete pavement: is the heyday over?

Started by Crazy Volvo Guy, May 30, 2010, 11:11:06 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Crazy Volvo Guy

I hate Clearview, because it looks like a cheap Chinese ripoff.

I'm for the Red Sox and whoever's playing against the Yankees.


Mr_Northside

I don't have opinions anymore. All I know is that no one is better than anyone else, and everyone is the best at everything

PAHighways

I can't speak for 222, but US 15 had subsidence issues in that area and so asphalt was used as an overlay since if it cracked it can be recycled.  The same problem occurred at Exit 44/PA 136 on Turnpike 43 and asphalt was used as the top coat, rather than concrete which is how all of the extensions have been built.

Crazy Volvo Guy

I see.  I also got to thinking that perhaps they were in a rush to get 222 done.  I was last in Allentown 5 years ago and there was a LOT of traffic in the area near 222, even back then.
I hate Clearview, because it looks like a cheap Chinese ripoff.

I'm for the Red Sox and whoever's playing against the Yankees.

signalman

I think time was a factor and PennDOT was in a rush to get the bypass open.  The old 222 (Hamilton Blvd) has been plagued with heavy traffic for years.  Interestingly enough, I'll be in that area on Saturday.

Mr_Northside

The US-22 reconstruction / widening projects in Westmoreland county have been done in concrete, but I noticed back in 2006/2007 that the redo of a section starting in Cambria County was done in asphalt. 
(I'm not sure what has been done on the route in Indiana county, as I haven't been on it between Blairsville and Armagh since mid-2006, when the project after the US-119 split was still pretty young)
I don't have opinions anymore. All I know is that no one is better than anyone else, and everyone is the best at everything

PAHighways

The US 22 upgrading project is concrete as per standard PennDOT practice.

NJRoadfan

Quote from: signalman on June 01, 2010, 06:23:26 PM
I think time was a factor and PennDOT was in a rush to get the bypass open.  The old 222 (Hamilton Blvd) has been plagued with heavy traffic for years.  Interestingly enough, I'll be in that area on Saturday.

Are they ever going to connect the Kutztown and Reading Bypasses of US-222? Seems kinda stupid to have such a busy corridor with a 2 lane section in between. I haven't been in the area since 1996, and it was a mess back then.

PAHighways

There was a study conducted during the last decade on connecting the two segments, and recently locals have been pushing PennDOT to build an expressway.

Mr_Northside

I don't have opinions anymore. All I know is that no one is better than anyone else, and everyone is the best at everything

PAHighways

PennDOT usually uses an asphalt overlay when rehabilitating a road, such as District 12 did when it rebuilt 30 between Greensburg and Latrobe during the late 90s/early 00s.  If it is an overlay on an entirely new section, there had to be a reason such as ones I mentioned earlier.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.