News:

While the Forum is up and running, there are still thousands of guests (bots). Downtime may occur as a result.
- Alex

Main Menu

NYS Thruway first superhighway to use reflective technology

Started by Michael, January 27, 2011, 11:09:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Michael

Syracuse (WSYR-TV) - The State is beginning to replace painted lines with reflective strips along the Thruway to help drivers see at night and in bad weather. Some areas are already upgraded and long stretches in Central New York will be changed starting in 2012.

http://www.9wsyr.com/news/local/story/NYS-Thruway-first-superhighway-to-use-reflective/BJSVobmnoE6A49jmjouIEw.cspx

As of this post, the WSYR site has no video, but there was a major difference when I saw the report on T.V.
EDIT: There is now a video on the article page

This article from the Albany Times Union has more technical details.


vdeane

That explains why the portions of the exits 39-40 reconstruction zone that are done still don't have permanent striping.  They'll probably get reflective strips in late summer/early fall.
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

Duke87

I... do not think this is a good idea. You reach a point where you make things so reflective and glow so much that it causes too much contrast and makes it difficult to see things which aren't reflectivized.
Besides, has anyone really ever had a problem seeing lane lines in the dark? :eyebrow: They're white and yellow. The pavement is black. It's pretty difficult to mix them up. Okay, yes, so concrete pavement doesn't provide the same contrast but it also has that problem during the day.

Though, at least we don't have to worry about pavement markings washing out and becoming illegible when headlights (or the sun) shine on them like signs do.
If you always take the same road, you will never see anything new.

JREwing78

Quote from: Duke87 on January 29, 2011, 01:32:38 AM
Besides, has anyone really ever had a problem seeing lane lines in the dark? :eyebrow: They're white and yellow. The pavement is black. It's pretty difficult to mix them up.

In the dark? No.

In the rain in the dark? Yes, absolutely! In fact, I ended up forced off I-270 onto an off-ramp in Columbus one dark and stormy evening because I couldn't see the lines in the road.

vdeane

Quote from: Duke87 on January 29, 2011, 01:32:38 AM
Besides, has anyone really ever had a problem seeing lane lines in the dark? :eyebrow: They're white and yellow. The pavement is black. It's pretty difficult to mix them up.
Have you ever driven at night when it's pouring rain out, especially on a newly resurfaced road?
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

Duke87

Point taken on rain.

Eh, maybe I should withhold judgment until I see this stuff in action.
If you always take the same road, you will never see anything new.

Michael

Quote from: Duke87 on January 29, 2011, 01:32:38 AM
You reach a point where you make things so reflective and glow so much that it causes too much contrast and makes it difficult to see things which aren't reflectivized.

I was driving on the Thruway through the reconstruction between exits 39 and 40 (at night), and there were reflective strips of tape on the Jersey barriers, and it was very distracting in my opinion.  I'd guess they were a foot or two long, with about two feet between each one.

Revive 755

I wonder if this method is better than using reflective tape in groves as MoDOT had been doing.

Mergingtraffic

wont the plows peel this stuff up like everything else? 
I only take pics of good looking signs. Long live non-reflective button copy!
MergingTraffic https://www.flickr.com/photos/98731835@N05/

vdeane

Quote from: Michael on January 29, 2011, 03:53:03 PM

I was driving on the Thruway through the reconstruction between exits 39 and 40 (at night), and there were reflective strips of tape on the Jersey barriers, and it was very distracting in my opinion.  I'd guess they were a foot or two long, with about two feet between each one.
It probably was necessary to have them on the barriers though, considering that there's no shoulder in the reconstruction zones (except for the sections that have areas built in for police cars to sit in to enforce the 55mph speed limit).
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

DRMan

In NH, I have seen something similar to what the Times-Union article describes.  I couldn't say whether they used the same product the Thruway is using or if it's just paint.  A quick look at the NH DOT website didn't yield any info.  It does seem more visible at night, especially when it's wet.  This is on NH 101 just east of I-95, at the end of the divided section.

EDIT:  I just watched the video, and I'm now pretty sure NH is not using the same technology.  What I saw looks more like painted grooves.

Michael

Quote from: deanej on January 30, 2011, 12:41:21 PM
It probably was necessary to have them on the barriers though, considering that there's no shoulder in the reconstruction zones (except for the sections that have areas built in for police cars to sit in to enforce the 55mph speed limit).

I would have preferred to see delineators attached to the barriers.  The road surface had stripes right next to the barriers.

vdeane

Not on the left.  Here's a photo for reference:


For those that have never seen the area during construction: yes, the temporary right lane was really in the left shoulder of the other direction.
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

Michael

When I was there, the westbound lanes had all the traffic.  There's that annoying tape.  And that exit sign looks hideous.  I might go as far to say I'd prefer Clearview.

As an aside, I wonder if it would have been any better to use one set of lanes as a super-2 as opposed to a narrow two-lane freeway in each direction.  I'm not sure about the AADT counts for that area.

xcellntbuy

I have not driven west of Syracuse on the Thruway since 1983, but that long stretch from Exits 39 to 40 is, if I remember correctly, flat, largely straight and in a swamp.  The reflectorized markings may be necessary due to foggy conditions. :hmmm:

And, I agree, that Exit 40 signage is God-awful.

Quillz


Ian

UMaine graduate, former PennDOT employee, new SoCal resident.
Youtube l Flickr

Michael

I took a look at the latest Traffic Data Report (2009), and the 2009 AADT was 34,320.  Most local two lane roads had an AADT of about 15,000 at the most.  I wasn't sure if the AADT would be in NYSDOT's report because it's the Thruway.

@xcellntbuy
You may be thinking about the portion between exits 40 and 41 through the Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge.  The two miles or so through the refuge are a boring drive.  I don't recall seeing excessive fog there before.

@PennDOTFan
It wasn't fun to drive at all.

cu2010

Quote from: Michael on January 31, 2011, 08:37:26 PM
You may be thinking about the portion between exits 40 and 41 through the Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge.  The two miles or so through the refuge are a boring drive.  I don't recall seeing excessive fog there before.

The whole damn Thruway is a pretty boring drive! Precisely why, on my last trip north, I avoided the Thruway and took old US104 instead :D  (And I've driven that section between exits 39 and 40 several times since the construction started...scary as hell, especially when other cars are zooming past you in the narrow left lane doing well over the posted 55mph speed limit...)

As for the reflectors...on one hand, it could actually legitimately aid drivers, especially since the paint on newly-repaved roads here in NY seems to fade away after one winter's worth of plowing (leaving them barely visible, especially at night, until they repaint them in July or so). On the other hand, it seems like an incredible waste of money...
This is cu2010, reminding you, help control the ugly sign population, don't have your shields spayed or neutered.

Alps

In NJ, permanent road stripes have to use the glass beads in the paint material.  So the Thruway may be the first freeway to use This Specific Technology, but glass beads have been around for decades making sure you can see in the rain.

J N Winkler

Yes, I didn't really believe glass beads were the innovation.  I think it has more to do with obtaining some of the benefits of patterned cold plastic (including a contoured surface that resists complete coverage by water film) for a cost closer to that of thermoplastic.  It is really hard to tell from the newspaper articles, which are very vague.
"It is necessary to spend a hundred lire now to save a thousand lire later."--Piero Puricelli, explaining the need for a first-class road system to Benito Mussolini

Scott5114

Quote from: Duke87 on January 29, 2011, 01:32:38 AM
Besides, has anyone really ever had a problem seeing lane lines in the dark? :eyebrow:

I do, all the time, but that's because ODOT is shit and uses road paint that's barely reflective.
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.