News:

While the Forum is up and running, there are still thousands of guests (bots). Downtime may occur as a result.
- Alex

Main Menu

Cities annexing highways

Started by golden eagle, March 11, 2015, 12:47:27 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

golden eagle

For several miles southward from the US 49/98 interchange, Hattiesburg's city limits continues to stretch down 49 to near Camp Shelby. It didn't annex any land west or east of 49; just 49 itself. Same with Tuscaloosa, as a narrow strip of the city's border stretches out eastward on I-20/59. Seems to me that this is done for ticket-writing purposes (read: money grab by the local PDs).


wxfree

#1
Check out the city of Huxley, Texas.  It seems to be nothing but roads. 

http://www.dot.state.tx.us/apps-cg/grid_search/_includes/countymapbook/Pages/541.pdf

According to an online article, it was drawn that way in order to include only houses of customers who wanted to receive municipal gas service and get out of the high prices of the area's commercial gas service.

http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/hlh60

Edit:

I don't know how many states use the concept of extraterritorial jurisdiction, but in Texas every size of city has some ETJ, and the biggest cities have five miles of it.  In ETJ a city can enforce certain planning ordinances and can annex territory almost at will, and no other city can incorporate or annex territory within it.  This incentivizes the annexation of strips along state highways, which require no municipal services (but bring the potential for traffic violation fine revenues), so that the ETJ is extended and ensures the potential to capture future tax revenues.

ETJ is bigger for bigger cities.  There is a bill in the legislature that would set the ETJ for all cities at a half-mile.
I'd like to buy a vowel, Alex.  What is E?

All roads lead away from Rome.

NE2

pre-1945 Florida route log

I accept and respect your identity as long as it's not dumb shit like "identifying as a vaccinated attack helicopter".

usends

Quote from: NE2 on March 11, 2015, 01:34:28 AM
Oklahoma is particularly bad wrt enclosing areas by thin strips. See Muskogee and Durant.

I agree, it seems to be epidemic in Oklahoma (although my impression, perhaps incorrect, is that the practice started in Texas).  Tulsa and just about all of its suburbs have done the same thing.  Check out the huge strip annexation that Claremore did to its east, and how Owasso is trying to box out Limestone to its east.  In most cases, I don't think it's really about ticket revenues.  Rather, I think it's primarily about city planning.  They want to be in control of zoning in the area that surrounds their existing development, and to carve out some space into which they can grow as future development is desired.  The concern is that, if you don't create space for your own city, another municipality will encroach, and then you're not in control.

texaskdog

Texas loves to annex the rivers...the riverbanks tend to all be part of Austin

SD Mapman

The traveler sees what he sees, the tourist sees what he has come to see. - G.K. Chesterton

clong

Quote from: NE2 on March 11, 2015, 01:34:28 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Municipal_annexation_in_the_United_States#Shoestring_annexation

Oklahoma is particularly bad wrt enclosing areas by thin strips. See Muskogee and Durant.

There are several entertaining city limits in the Birmingham, AL area including:
Birmingham, AL - mostly due to water supply and commercial development http://goo.gl/maps/14lmm
Vestavia Hills, AL - discontinuous city limits only allowed by an amendment to the State Constitution http://goo.gl/maps/8gUpK

BamaZeus

Quote from: golden eagle on March 11, 2015, 12:47:27 AM
For several miles southward from the US 49/98 interchange, Hattiesburg's city limits continues to stretch down 49 to near Camp Shelby. It didn't annex any land west or east of 49; just 49 itself. Same with Tuscaloosa, as a narrow strip of the city's border stretches out eastward on I-20/59. Seems to me that this is done for ticket-writing purposes (read: money grab by the local PDs).

The Tuscaloosa annexation was done to connect the Mercedes plant with Tuscaloosa city utilities.

hbelkins

Burnside, Ky. annexed a section of shoreline along Lake Cumberland so a restaurant at a marina could sell alcohol when the city went wet while the county was still dry.

Annexing along highways is pretty common.
Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

TheStranger

Quote from: SD Mapman on March 11, 2015, 11:12:14 AM
Island Park, Idaho... that is all.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_Park,_Idaho

I'm surprised that the city limits were never expanded to include all of US 20 along that stretch, after the main road moved off of what is now old US 191.  Also fascinating: how the street grid near Henry's Fork is only partially included in the municipal boundary.

Chris Sampang

Pink Jazz

Strip annexation was once very common in Arizona, but was banned in 1980 as municipalities were doing so to prevent other municipalities from annexing the same area.  This past strip annexation practice created lots of "county islands", unincorporated areas of counties completely surrounded by a municipality.

cpzilliacus

There are a few places in Maryland that have done "shoestring" annexations, but it is usually to reach a parcel that the owners want to be within the corporate limits of the municipality.  Berlin, Worcester County, on the Eastern Shore comes to mind as a good example of this (map here)
Opinions expressed here on AAROADS are strictly personal and mine alone, and do not reflect policies or positions of MWCOG, NCRTPB or their member federal, state, county and municipal governments or any other agency.

oscar

IIRC, Coburg OR annexed some of I-5, and land on the other side of the highway from the town, to preserve a speed trap it was running on I-5.
my Hot Springs and Highways pages, with links to my roads sites:
http://www.alaskaroads.com/home.html

freebrickproductions

Quote from: clong on March 11, 2015, 11:14:35 AM
Quote from: NE2 on March 11, 2015, 01:34:28 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Municipal_annexation_in_the_United_States#Shoestring_annexation

Oklahoma is particularly bad wrt enclosing areas by thin strips. See Muskogee and Durant.

There are several entertaining city limits in the Birmingham, AL area including:
Birmingham, AL - mostly due to water supply and commercial development http://goo.gl/maps/14lmm
Vestavia Hills, AL - discontinuous city limits only allowed by an amendment to the State Constitution http://goo.gl/maps/8gUpK
Don't forget about Huntsville, AL, which has almost completely boxed in Madison.
It's all fun & games until someone summons Cthulhu and brings about the end of the world.

I also collect traffic lights, road signs, fans, and railroad crossing equipment.

Art in avatar by Moncatto (18+)!

(They/Them)

TheStranger

Related but distinct from this:

Los Angeles annexed the Harbor Gateway area many years ago (early 1900s) to gain contiguous land access to San Pedro/Wilmington.  Three decades later, State Route 11 was established along Figueroa Street which runs through much of this narrow district.

As a result of this and the San Pedro annexation, the Harbor Freeway segment of 110 (the modern major highway supplanting Figueroa in this function) runs almost entirely within the City of Los Angeles, except for a short segment south of 405 in Carson.  (For that matter, 110 as a whole only leaves LA in the aforementioned Carson section and for the final few miles in South Pasadena/Pasadena)
Chris Sampang

cbeach40

Northwest of Toronto, Dufferin County wanted to build a bypass of the town of Orangeville, which sits immediately north of the county line. Unfortunately for that plan, a good chunk of the available corridor falls south of the line, within Peel Region. So what has happened is while the bypass was constructed within the one region, it is actually owned, maintained, and signed by Dufferin.

The portion within Peel is a controlled access arterial, so there aren't any properties directly affected by this odd arrangement.
and waterrrrrrr!

xotoxi

Shenanigans like strip annexation is something that we New Englanders know nothing about. 

Same with unincorporated county land.

froggie

Not entirely true...there is some "unincorporated" county land in northern Maine.  There are also 4 such parcels (the "Gores" and one "Grant") in Vermont.  I believe all four Vermont examples are uninhabited, though there's a state highway (VT 17) that runs through one of them.

SectorZ

Quote from: froggie on March 17, 2015, 08:52:03 AM
Not entirely true...there is some "unincorporated" county land in northern Maine.  There are also 4 such parcels (the "Gores" and one "Grant") in Vermont.  I believe all four Vermont examples are uninhabited, though there's a state highway (VT 17) that runs through one of them.

A few in northern NH (around Mt Washington and north of Errol) as well. For southern New England though, 3 states with every inch of ground being a part of a town or city.

Roadrunner75

This reminds me of Hampton, FL which made the news for its speed traps last year.  This sentence from its Wikipedia page says it all:
"In the mid 1990s, Hampton annexed a short stretch of U.S. Highway 301 west of the city in order to get revenue from traffic tickets issued to motorists driving on that highway".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hampton,_Florida
Apparently the state has let them stay incorporated after deannexing the strip of highway and decommissioning their police force, among other reforms.

iBallasticwolf2

Milton, Kentucky does this on US 421
Only two things are infinite in this world, stupidity, and I-75 construction



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.