News:

Am able to again make updates to the Shield Gallery!
- Alex

Main Menu

Many communities across the northeast are running out of rock salt

Started by SteveG1988, February 12, 2014, 06:07:15 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

SteveG1988

Roads Clinched

I55,I82,I84(E&W)I88(W),I87(N),I81,I64,I74(W),I72,I57,I24,I65,I59,I12,I71,I77,I76(E&W),I70,I79,I85,I86(W),I27,I16,I97,I96,I43,I41,


Takumi

What happens when the Northeast runs out of rock salt?

#rocksaltwar
Quote from: Rothman on July 15, 2021, 07:52:59 AM
Olive Garden must be stopped.  I must stop them.

Don't @ me. Seriously.

Alps

And then I saw a rock!
But it wasn't a rock...
It was a rock... SALT!
Rock salt!

Rock salt!

Duke87

What's odd about this story is that salt is cheap and common as dirt. Replenishing depleted stockpiles is not something you'd think would be difficult. Hell, if pickle juice works, why not seawater?
If you always take the same road, you will never see anything new.

corco

Or they could just switch to sand like the west does...less car damage.

Alps

Quote from: Duke87 on February 12, 2014, 07:48:17 PM
What's odd about this story is that salt is cheap and common as dirt. Replenishing depleted stockpiles is not something you'd think would be difficult. Hell, if pickle juice works, why not seawater?

Salt is cheap, until you need megatons of it. Seawater is free, until you need to actually get it out of the sea. I don't know if you've noticed, but states like NJ aren't exactly overflowing with highway money at the moment.

vdeane

Sand doesn't create the bare pavement those of us in NY are accustomed to.  Plus it turns into a beach in spring and summer (especially if nobody removes it) and is really annoying to track into houses on shoes.
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

corco

Quote from: vdeane on February 12, 2014, 09:26:12 PM
Sand doesn't create the bare pavement those of us in NY are accustomed to.  Plus it turns into a beach in spring and summer (especially if nobody removes it) and is really annoying to track into houses on shoes.

True dat. We got 18 inches of snow last weekend here, and our little town in Montana doesn't have a snowplow but they do sand...liberally. It was a powdery delight to drive in earlier this week if you have a pickup or SUV or something with ground clearance, but it's been 50 degrees the last day and a half and now we a muddy, disgusting mess on the roads, to say the least.

agentsteel53

sanded down packed snow is great to drive in.  Montana does it really well.  I was doing 60mph without any problem a few months ago on I-94, US-12, etc.
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

Duke87

The usefulness of sand increases as temperature decreases. Areas that use just sand and have it work for them are areas where you have fresh snow when it's 5-10 degrees out. Around here it's usually fresh snow and 25-30 degrees out... in these conditions the sand isn't particularly helpful since you just end up with sandy slush on the roads, which offers no better traction than clean slush.

Sand is, however, more environmentally friendly since it doesn't introduce salt into streams and ponds that are supposed to contain freshwater.
If you always take the same road, you will never see anything new.

KEVIN_224

I heard a story today on WINS-AM 1010 in New York about one guy on Long Island who uses a combination of salt and beet juice. No joke! :)

corco

Quote from: Duke87 on February 12, 2014, 10:47:08 PM
The usefulness of sand increases as temperature decreases. Areas that use just sand and have it work for them are areas where you have fresh snow when it's 5-10 degrees out. Around here it's usually fresh snow and 25-30 degrees out... in these conditions the sand isn't particularly helpful since you just end up with sandy slush on the roads, which offers no better traction than clean slush.

Sand is, however, more environmentally friendly since it doesn't introduce salt into streams and ponds that are supposed to contain freshwater.

This exactly- the packed snow/sand combo is admittedly just fine for going 60+ on when it's cold, but once it starts melting it can get nasty. Right now we're going through a freeze/thaw cycle where it's 50 during the day and 20 at night, and our roads are terrible since the city can't afford to plow.

That said! I'd still take the tradeoff of being able to drive a car for ten winters and have it still look like new. Rust is  all but unheard of around these parts, and that's worth a couple days a year of really shitty roads to me.

jeffandnicole

Quote from: corco on February 12, 2014, 07:52:21 PM
Or they could just switch to sand like the west does...less car damage.

Sand is good for traction, but doesn't do much in the way of melting the snow and ice.

Salt is great for melting the snow and ice, but the environment ain't happy about it.

Quote from: Duke87 on February 12, 2014, 07:48:17 PM

What's odd about this story is that salt is cheap and common as dirt. Replenishing depleted stockpiles is not something you'd think would be difficult.

It comes down to storage & delivery issues.  The salt starts in mines...they have to get it to the bigass depots, where the states, counties & towns get it from, then delivered to their storage sheds.  When everyone runs out at once, there's only so much availability at the bigass depot, and they will deliver to their largest clients first.  Thus, the states are doing well right now with their quantities of salt (quality is another issue though, as I observed today).  The smaller counties and municipalities are going to be the ones in trouble with this current storm.

Pete from Boston

Quote from: corco on February 12, 2014, 11:10:26 PM
Quote from: Duke87 on February 12, 2014, 10:47:08 PM
The usefulness of sand increases as temperature decreases. Areas that use just sand and have it work for them are areas where you have fresh snow when it's 5-10 degrees out. Around here it's usually fresh snow and 25-30 degrees out... in these conditions the sand isn't particularly helpful since you just end up with sandy slush on the roads, which offers no better traction than clean slush.

Sand is, however, more environmentally friendly since it doesn't introduce salt into streams and ponds that are supposed to contain freshwater.

This exactly- the packed snow/sand combo is admittedly just fine for going 60+ on when it's cold, but once it starts melting it can get nasty. Right now we're going through a freeze/thaw cycle where it's 50 during the day and 20 at night, and our roads are terrible since the city can't afford to plow.

That said! I'd still take the tradeoff of being able to drive a car for ten winters and have it still look like new. Rust is  all but unheard of around these parts, and that's worth a couple days a year of really shitty roads to me.

My truck came from out west and no mechanic here can believe its condition at 17 years old.  This winter is really making noticeable inroads on the rust, though.  It pains me, but such is the northeast.

Brandon

Quote from: agentsteel53 on February 12, 2014, 09:43:16 PM
sanded down packed snow is great to drive in.  Montana does it really well.  I was doing 60mph without any problem a few months ago on I-94, US-12, etc.

Michigan does it well as well, in the Upper Peninsula.  With 200 inches of snow in an average season, there is no such thing as plowing down to pavement.

As far as the slat shortage, some municipalities here in NE Illinois are feeling it, but others planned ahead or bought more.  Hence, there's a hodge podge of well cleared streets and snow/ice covered ones.
"If you think this has a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention." - Ramsay Bolton, "Game of Thrones"

"Symbolic of his struggle against reality." - Reg, "Monty Python's Life of Brian"

mass_citizen

sand is also bad for the environment in that it washes into catch basins and drainage ditches which run to rivers and streams, increasing sedimentation in those water bodies. also leads to clogged drainage structures and increased flooding in the spring.

also pits the paint on the front of your car.

agentsteel53

Quote from: Pete from Boston on February 13, 2014, 12:36:02 AM

My truck came from out west and no mechanic here can believe its condition at 17 years old.  This winter is really making noticeable inroads on the rust, though.  It pains me, but such is the northeast.

mine's the exact opposite.  it's a '95, and spent most of its life in the Coeur d'Alene area and I'm looking at needing to completely replace the exhaust (muffler, cat converter, and the pipes inbetween) fairly soon.  I suppose Idaho is a salt state, as opposed to a sand state?
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

Brandon

Quote from: mass_citizen on February 13, 2014, 08:05:46 AM
sand is also bad for the environment in that it washes into catch basins and drainage ditches which run to rivers and streams, increasing sedimentation in those water bodies. also leads to clogged drainage structures and increased flooding in the spring.

also pits the paint on the front of your car.

You should see the cleanup operations in Houghton, Michigan at the end of the season.  They use a lot of sand (collected from the stamp sand beaches) and the cleanup is just as awesome to watch as the actual snow removal.
"If you think this has a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention." - Ramsay Bolton, "Game of Thrones"

"Symbolic of his struggle against reality." - Reg, "Monty Python's Life of Brian"

roadman

Quote from: Duke87 on February 12, 2014, 10:47:08 PM
Sand is, however, more environmentally friendly since it doesn't introduce salt into streams and ponds that are supposed to contain freshwater.

Not exactly.  http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2012/12/19/good-question-why-dont-we-use-sand-on-the-roads-anymore/
"And ninety-five is the route you were on.  It was not the speed limit sign."  - Jim Croce (from Speedball Tucker)

"My life has been a tapestry
Of years of roads and highway signs" (with apologies to Carole King and Tom Rush)

Duke87

Quote from: corco on February 12, 2014, 11:10:26 PM
That said! I'd still take the tradeoff of being able to drive a car for ten winters and have it still look like new. Rust is  all but unheard of around these parts, and that's worth a couple days a year of really shitty roads to me.

The issue isn't looking like new. Car bodies these days are far less rust prone than their predecessors. Hell, my fenders are made of plastic. Rust that, I dare you!

The issue is that cars still are built with a lot of vital components exposed on the underside, and those can and will rust. You won't see it, but you'll notice it when something breaks.
If you always take the same road, you will never see anything new.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.