News:

Finished coding the back end of the AARoads main site using object-orientated programming. One major step closer to moving away from Wordpress!

Main Menu

Indiana flashing lights

Started by monty, August 09, 2013, 11:49:29 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

monty

I noticed that recently INDOT has change the flashing sequence on the caution / stop lights at intersections in the Greenfield District.  All have two signal heads and they used to blink alternatively (like a RR crossing signal).  Now they are on the same cycle (bloth flash on and off at the same time in sequence).  I notice that different states use different flash patterns.  Why the change here? 
monty


Alex

Quote from: monty on August 09, 2013, 11:49:29 AM
I noticed that recently INDOT has change the flashing sequence on the caution / stop lights at intersections in the Greenfield District.  All have two signal heads and they used to blink alternatively (like a RR crossing signal).  Now they are on the same cycle (bloth flash on and off at the same time in sequence).  I notice that different states use different flash patterns.  Why the change here?

Changes made per the MUTCD:

2009 Edition Chapter 4L. Flashing Beacons

Quote05 If two horizontally aligned red signal indications are used on an approach for an Intersection Control Beacon, they shall be flashed simultaneously to avoid being confused with grade crossing flashing-light signals.

monty

Thanks Alex.  These lights have been on the alternative flash cycle all my life in this area.  So, since the standards cited are from the 2009 edition, it's taken 4 years to get them up to standard.
monty

Big John

Quote from: monty on August 09, 2013, 12:16:34 PM
Thanks Alex.  These lights have been on the alternative flash cycle all my life in this area.  So, since the standards cited are from the 2009 edition, it's taken 4 years to get them up to standard.
Actually, Indiana has their own MUTCD, but must closely match federal standards.  Theirs was implemented in 2011, so it is 2 years late.

And that rule is in the IN MUTCD: http://www.in.gov/dot/div/contracts/design/mutcd/2011rev1/part4l.pdf

Avalanchez71


DaBigE

Quote from: Alex on August 09, 2013, 12:08:11 PM
Changes made per the MUTCD:

2009 Edition Chapter 4L. Flashing Beacons

Quote05 If two horizontally aligned red signal indications are used on an approach for an Intersection Control Beacon, they shall be flashed simultaneously to avoid being confused with grade crossing flashing-light signals.

And yet they approved the sequence used in a HAWK :pan:
"We gotta find this road, it's like Bob's road!" - Rabbit, Twister

hbelkins

Kentucky hasn't switched all their flashers over. My district changed them from alternating to simultaneous earlier this year, but some districts still have them flashing alternately.
Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

Avalanchez71

I prefer the alternating flashing pattern.  It is more distinctive.

Alps

Quote from: Alex on August 09, 2013, 12:08:11 PM
Quote from: monty on August 09, 2013, 11:49:29 AM
I noticed that recently INDOT has change the flashing sequence on the caution / stop lights at intersections in the Greenfield District.  All have two signal heads and they used to blink alternatively (like a RR crossing signal).  Now they are on the same cycle (bloth flash on and off at the same time in sequence).  I notice that different states use different flash patterns.  Why the change here?

Changes made per the MUTCD:

2009 Edition Chapter 4L. Flashing Beacons

Quote05 If two horizontally aligned red signal indications are used on an approach for an Intersection Control Beacon, they shall be flashed simultaneously to avoid being confused with grade crossing flashing-light signals.
Didn't seem to stop the HAWK signals...



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.