News:

While the Forum is up and running, there are still thousands of guests (bots). Downtime may occur as a result.
- Alex

Main Menu

Golden Gate Bridge Considers Charging Pedestrians, Cyclists

Started by bing101, October 26, 2014, 10:26:15 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

jeffandnicole

Quote from: J N Winkler on October 27, 2014, 11:38:37 PM
Also, metro tunnels are not comparable.  When you pay to use them, you are also paying for mechanical transport from one end to the other.  When you cross the GGB as a pedestrian or bicyclist, you are supplying your own power and enhancing your own muscular strength and cardiovascular fitness, which all people should be doing.  Why disincentivize them from doing so by charging them?

Where have I heard a similar argument?  Oh yeah...

I already paid a fuel tax.  Why do I have to pay a toll also? 


J N Winkler

Quote from: jeffandnicole on October 29, 2014, 10:03:20 PMWhere have I heard a similar argument?  Oh yeah...

I already paid a fuel tax.  Why do I have to pay a toll also?

This is not your father's double-charging argument.  Exercise is virtuous and thus deserves treatment on the same basis as, oh, DMV clean-air decals.
"It is necessary to spend a hundred lire now to save a thousand lire later."--Piero Puricelli, explaining the need for a first-class road system to Benito Mussolini

vdeane

Quote from: GaryV on October 29, 2014, 08:58:44 PM
You mean I have to PAY to commit suicide?
More like make an unsuccessful attempt.  They're installing a suicide fence/net if they haven't already.
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.