News:

Am able to again make updates to the Shield Gallery!
- Alex

Main Menu

Highway 0?

Started by SignGeek101, May 23, 2015, 01:10:31 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

SignGeek101

This is kind of a silly question, but why aren't there any highway zero's in North America? Zero is a legitimate number, is it not?


CNGL-Leudimin

We already had this some time ago. I know of a couple routes 0 in Europe, but none outside. Internally I have the Western US 2 as US 0 to differentiate it from the Eastern US 2 :bigass:.
Supporter of the construction of several running gags, including I-366 with a speed limit of 85 mph (137 km/h) and the Hypotenuse.

Please note that I may mention "invalid" FM channels, i.e. ending in an even number or down to 87.5. These are valid in Europe.

wxfree

Yes, it's a perfectly cromulent number.
I'd like to buy a vowel, Alex.  What is E?

All roads lead away from Rome.

english si

Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on May 23, 2015, 05:58:22 AMI know of a couple routes 0 in Europe, but none outside.
All of which are capital beltways.

R0 - Brussels
M0 - Budapest
A0 - proposed Bucharest belt

London's cycle network has a circular route 0 too.

GaryV

Quote from: SignGeek101 on May 23, 2015, 01:10:31 AM
This is kind of a silly question, but why aren't there any highway zero's in North America? Zero is a legitimate number, is it not?

Sure.  But to make it sillier, other legitimate numbers are 1/2, 234.425, sqrt(93) and pi.  Doesn't mean we need to use them for highways though.

6a


SignGeek101

Quote from: GaryV on May 23, 2015, 07:35:16 AM
Quote from: SignGeek101 on May 23, 2015, 01:10:31 AM
This is kind of a silly question, but why aren't there any highway zero's in North America? Zero is a legitimate number, is it not?

Sure.  But to make it sillier, other legitimate numbers are 1/2, 234.425, sqrt(93) and pi.  Doesn't mean we need to use them for highways though.

Those numbers aren't integers though.  :-P

hotdogPi

Quote from: SignGeek101 on May 23, 2015, 11:36:48 AM
Quote from: GaryV on May 23, 2015, 07:35:16 AM
Quote from: SignGeek101 on May 23, 2015, 01:10:31 AM
This is kind of a silly question, but why aren't there any highway zero's in North America? Zero is a legitimate number, is it not?

Sure.  But to make it sillier, other legitimate numbers are 1/2, 234.425, sqrt(93) and pi.  Doesn't mean we need to use them for highways though.

Those numbers aren't integers though.  :-P

-1 is an integer. Is it used anywhere?
Clinched

Traveled, plus
US 13, 50
MA 22, 35, 40, 53, 79, 107, 109, 126, 138, 141, 159
NH 27, 78, 111A(E); CA 90; NY 366; GA 42, 140; FL A1A, 7; CT 32, 320; VT 2A, 5A; PA 3, 51, 60, WA 202; QC 162, 165, 263; 🇬🇧A100, A3211, A3213, A3215, A4222; 🇫🇷95 D316

Lowest untraveled: 36

nexus73

Quote from: 1 on May 23, 2015, 11:49:45 AM
Quote from: SignGeek101 on May 23, 2015, 11:36:48 AM
Quote from: GaryV on May 23, 2015, 07:35:16 AM
Quote from: SignGeek101 on May 23, 2015, 01:10:31 AM
This is kind of a silly question, but why aren't there any highway zero's in North America? Zero is a legitimate number, is it not?

Sure.  But to make it sillier, other legitimate numbers are 1/2, 234.425, sqrt(93) and pi.  Doesn't mean we need to use them for highways though.

Those numbers aren't integers though.  :-P

-1 is an integer. Is it used anywhere?

If we used the square root of -1 we would have an imaginary number that is perfectly suited for an imaginary road...LOL!

Rick
US 101 is THE backbone of the Pacific coast from Bandon OR to Willits CA.  Industry, tourism and local traffic would be gone or severely crippled without it being in functioning condition in BOTH states.

Kacie Jane

Quote from: SignGeek101 on May 23, 2015, 11:36:48 AM
Quote from: GaryV on May 23, 2015, 07:35:16 AM
Quote from: SignGeek101 on May 23, 2015, 01:10:31 AM
This is kind of a silly question, but why aren't there any highway zero's in North America? Zero is a legitimate number, is it not?

Sure.  But to make it sillier, other legitimate numbers are 1/2, 234.425, sqrt(93) and pi.  Doesn't mean we need to use them for highways though.

Those numbers aren't integers though.  :-P

And zero isn't a positive integer.  I'm not sure why the decision seems to have been made that highway numbers on this side of the Atlantic have to be positive integers, but it's a decision I agree with (again for reasons I can't necessarily identify).

Zzonkmiles

I would support an Interstate 0 over an Interstate 101 for the East Coast.

admtrap

More political than anything else.

The number one has a lot of positive connotations - first place.  Whereas the number zero has largely negative connotations - worthless, null.  Compare "you're number one" to "you're a zero"

Cities and states don't want to be associated with number zero, so there's no route zeroes. 

That's really all there is to it IMO.


SignGeek101

#12
Quote from: admtrap on May 24, 2015, 01:24:35 PM
More political than anything else.

The number one has a lot of positive connotations - first place.  Whereas the number zero has largely negative connotations - worthless, null.  Compare "you're number one" to "you're a zero"

Cities and states don't want to be associated with number zero, so there's no route zeroes. 

That's really all there is to it IMO.

That's the reason why Ontario doesn't have a highway 1.

(from http://www.thekingshighway.ca/faq.htm).

vtk

Michigan initially skipped the numbers 1—9 for that reason.
Wait, it's all Ohio? Always has been.

c172

I would find a hwy 0 kind of odd, but I have seen highways with a leading 0 (hwy 0547 or whatever). Just county roads somewhere, I think. And addressing a post after the OP, I did see a CR in Yolo County, Ca (Davis, Woodland, West Sacramento) that was "x 1/2, where x=an integer.

Equally odd, but something I have actually seen, is a transit route #0. It's run by Valley Metro in Phoenix.

bulldog1979

Williams County, Ohio, has a unique (at least to me) system of numbering its CRs. the north—south roads are numbered and the east—west ones are lettered. The state line is CR 1, and one mile east of there is CR 2, etc. The road that falls in between them is CR 1.50. Some others fall at other decimal values, so #.75 wouldn't be out of place. The east—west CR that ran next to the hotel where I used to work is CR M.50 as it is halfway between CR M and CR N. It's not the only one with a decimal appended to a letter.

admtrap

Quote from: c172 on May 24, 2015, 10:51:46 PM
I would find a hwy 0 kind of odd, but I have seen highways with a leading 0 (hwy 0547 or whatever). Just county roads somewhere, I think. And addressing a post after the OP, I did see a CR in Yolo County, Ca (Davis, Woodland, West Sacramento) that was "x 1/2, where x=an integer.

Equally odd, but something I have actually seen, is a transit route #0. It's run by Valley Metro in Phoenix.

Was it a Pentagon-shielded route number, or was it just a road name (as in Avenue 12 1/2 or Road 26 1/2)?  Madera County and Tulare County both do that for most of their roads.  Those aren't route numbers, they're just lazy naming schemes. 

c172

They didn't use the blue CR marker. They used gantries and other green signs.

OCGuy81

Quote from: wxfree on May 23, 2015, 06:04:30 AM
Yes, it's a perfectly cromulent number.

I love the Simpsons reference here! You've embiggened the forum with that.

mrose

Wisconsin doesn't have any single digit numbers either, apart from its US routes 2 and 8. I always wondered why that was. Would a reason that petty seriously happen?

bzakharin

Quote from: Zzonkmiles on May 24, 2015, 11:21:06 AM
I would support an Interstate 0 over an Interstate 101 for the East Coast.
Wouldn't 0 be an East-West route anyway? Also, is there really a possibility for another north-south 2-digit interstate on the east coast any time soon?

Avalanchez71

So what is the deal with the county roads in Leon County, FL with the leading zero anyway?

admtrap

Quote from: bzakharin on May 28, 2015, 02:24:37 PM
Quote from: Zzonkmiles on May 24, 2015, 11:21:06 AM
I would support an Interstate 0 over an Interstate 101 for the East Coast.
Wouldn't 0 be an East-West route anyway? Also, is there really a possibility for another north-south 2-digit interstate on the east coast any time soon?

Well, there have been suggestions to upgrade the US 13/17 corridor as a relief route/alternate to I-95 roughly from Wilmington or Philadelphia down to Raleigh via Newport News.  It would have made a very nice I-99 routing, and 101 is the logical substitute (what else are they gonna call it?  The lowest unused 2di odd is 67, after all).  But realistically, not any time soon. 

Rover_0

I've toyed with this thought, and it would (slightly) violate US Route numbering conventions, but what about MSR-200? Or if you're feeling more ambitious, reroute US-2 onto 200 and renumber 2 as 0.

But if anything, MSR-200 becomes US-200.
Fixing erroneous shields, one at a time...

Alex

Quote from: Avalanchez71 on May 28, 2015, 03:13:10 PM
So what is the deal with the county roads in Leon County, FL with the leading zero anyway?

See this post.

And where NE2 wrote:

QuoteSee http://www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/statistics/hwysys/jurisdictionhandbook.pdf (p. 21).

Reveals the numbering for Leon County:




Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.