AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: I-69 in TX  (Read 611803 times)

ethanhopkin14

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 955
  • Age: 41
  • Location: Austin, TX
  • Last Login: Today at 05:18:46 PM
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1750 on: October 06, 2020, 09:50:40 AM »

Never underestimate the value of an interstate:

Quote

Cleveland ISD is the fastest-growing school district in Texas, Superintendent of Schools Chris Trotter said. The district, which currently has 8,600 students, might reach as many as 15,000 by 2025, he estimates. The district has grown nearly 125% since the 2014-15 school year, when it had 3,829 students, according to a November 2019 presentation.

Trotter attributed that growth, in part, to Cleveland ISD’s location, intersected by Interstate 69 and State Highway 105 northeast of Houston.

https://www.bizjournals.com/houston/news/2020/10/01/cleveland-isd-breaks-ground-school.html



I have been banging this drum forever.  An interstate makes ALL the difference t so many things, not just that you can drive non-stop.

Yes, a freeway (Interstate if you must) does drive growth. That said,  Cleveland texas is about the urban sprawl from Houston. It is about the same distance from Downtown Houston as Conroe. The biggest thing Cleveland has going for it is the housing pricing is relatively low. Crime is relatively low.

I can certainly offer you another place that has grown similarly: Princeton TX. Princeton is 15 miles from a freeway of any type.  As far as that goes, Frisco and far north Plano were also on small roads when they began their rush.  SH121 was 2 lanes at places going either east toward McKinney and west toward Grapevine.  Preston Road (which is what the growth surrounded, was a four-lane road (mostly) . While Frisco went nuts after SRT was built and DNT were extended the need for the sprawl to spread northward was necessary even without roads.

Just like Frisco  grew up around Preston Rd (SH-289) and Celina and Gunter are sprawling, Cleveland would most probably have grown up without I-69.  That said, the growth makes I-69 be needed even more than before.

It's a combination of both.  Urban sprawl happens along freeways, because it makes a long distance not seem like such a long distance.  You can take towns out the same distance away from the core as Cleveland and Conroe is, but there isn't as much growth because there isn't a freeway (Dayton and Liberty). 
Logged

TheBox

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 7
  • Location: Houston, TX, United States
  • Last Login: February 04, 2021, 12:39:59 AM
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1751 on: November 22, 2020, 10:01:38 PM »

Any news on the US 59/I-69 expansion in between Richmond-Rosenburg to Beasley and maybe Kendleton?

EDIT: and any news on the US 77/I-69 Driscoll and US 59/I-69 Nacogdoches bypasses too?

« Last Edit: November 22, 2020, 10:04:26 PM by TheBox »
Logged

MaxConcrete

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 692
  • Location: Houston, TX
  • Last Login: Today at 07:32:18 PM
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1752 on: November 22, 2020, 10:51:39 PM »

EDIT: and any news on the US 77/I-69 Driscoll and US 59/I-69 Nacogdoches bypasses too?

The work on I-69 at Nachogdoches was proceeding well when I drove through on September 7. See photos below. The section to the south of the elevated connector was not as far along but all right-of-way was cleared with work in progress.

Further south at Diboll, the forest was cleared from the right-of-way. As I've mentioned before, there is a tremendous amount of work still needing to be done to upgrade the corridor to Interstate standards all the way to Houston, and the projects in progress are addressing the worst slowdown locations.


Looking north along I-69, just south of Loop 224, on September 7, 2020



Construction of elevated connectors on September 7, 2020

radDFW

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 129
  • Some guy with some sign knowledge

  • Age: 1020
  • Location: DFW, Texas
  • Last Login: February 18, 2021, 01:53:17 PM
    • YouTube
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1753 on: November 22, 2020, 11:21:33 PM »

EDIT: and any news on the US 77/I-69 Driscoll and US 59/I-69 Nacogdoches bypasses too?

The work on I-69 at Nachogdoches was proceeding well when I drove through on September 7. See photos below. The section to the south of the elevated connector was not as far along but all right-of-way was cleared with work in progress.

Further south at Diboll, the forest was cleared from the right-of-way. As I've mentioned before, there is a tremendous amount of work still needing to be done to upgrade the corridor to Interstate standards all the way to Houston, and the projects in progress are addressing the worst slowdown locations.


Looking north along I-69, just south of Loop 224, on September 7, 2020



Construction of elevated connectors on September 7, 2020
I had no idea work on I-69 in East Texas was already started! Do you happen to have the current alignment plan?
Logged

sparker

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 7639
  • Location: Bay Area, CA
  • Last Login: Today at 08:29:26 PM
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1754 on: November 23, 2020, 05:24:13 AM »

EDIT: and any news on the US 77/I-69 Driscoll and US 59/I-69 Nacogdoches bypasses too?

The work on I-69 at Nachogdoches was proceeding well when I drove through on September 7. See photos below. The section to the south of the elevated connector was not as far along but all right-of-way was cleared with work in progress.

Further south at Diboll, the forest was cleared from the right-of-way. As I've mentioned before, there is a tremendous amount of work still needing to be done to upgrade the corridor to Interstate standards all the way to Houston, and the projects in progress are addressing the worst slowdown locations.


Looking north along I-69, just south of Loop 224, on September 7, 2020



Construction of elevated connectors on September 7, 2020
I had no idea work on I-69 in East Texas was already started! Do you happen to have the current alignment plan?

Building the town bypasses first and following up with interim connections is always a good idea re rural freeway corridor sections, particularly when dealing with ongoing inflationary realities.  Get as much of the most expensive structures and interchange-heavy segments out of the way initially then connect them as funding allows.
Logged

TXtoNJ

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 620
  • Last Login: Today at 06:27:12 PM
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1755 on: November 23, 2020, 12:44:23 PM »

Building the town bypasses first and following up with interim connections is always a good idea re rural freeway corridor sections, particularly when dealing with ongoing inflationary realities.  Get as much of the most expensive structures and interchange-heavy segments out of the way initially then connect them as funding allows.

There's another Texas-specific justification here: there's no law limiting the 75 mph speed limit to specific highway types. A four-lane divided highway without controlled access is generally just as fast as a freeway so long as town centers are bypassed and major intersections are grade-separated.
Logged

edwaleni

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 975
  • Last Login: Today at 02:18:32 PM
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1756 on: November 23, 2020, 05:20:12 PM »

EDIT: and any news on the US 77/I-69 Driscoll and US 59/I-69 Nacogdoches bypasses too?

The work on I-69 at Nachogdoches was proceeding well when I drove through on September 7. See photos below. The section to the south of the elevated connector was not as far along but all right-of-way was cleared with work in progress.

Further south at Diboll, the forest was cleared from the right-of-way. As I've mentioned before, there is a tremendous amount of work still needing to be done to upgrade the corridor to Interstate standards all the way to Houston, and the projects in progress are addressing the worst slowdown locations.


Looking north along I-69, just south of Loop 224, on September 7, 2020


Construction of elevated connectors on September 7, 2020

The pictures reference this part of the project.

https://ftp.txdot.gov/pub/txdot-info/lfk/notices/090315-project-map.pdf

The full route schematic is here.

https://ftp.txdot.gov/pub/txdot-info/i69/projects/59/approved-schematic.pdf
« Last Edit: November 23, 2020, 05:29:18 PM by edwaleni »
Logged

coolkevs

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 10
  • Location: Madison WI
  • Last Login: Today at 10:28:16 AM
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1757 on: November 25, 2020, 10:33:53 AM »

I am unable to see the above pictures. Anybody else have that problem? Windows 10 laptop.
Logged

1

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 9352
  • UMass Lowell student

  • Age: 22
  • Location: MA/NH border
  • Last Login: Today at 08:29:11 PM
    • Flickr account
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1758 on: November 25, 2020, 10:41:57 AM »

I am unable to see the above pictures. Anybody else have that problem? Windows 10 laptop.

Google Chrome only allows HTTPS on this forum. HTTP photos won't show.
Logged
Clinched

Traveled, plus
US ⒔50
MA ⒐2⒉40.9⒐10⒎10⒐1⒒1⒘1⒚14⒈159
NH 27,38,111A(E); CA133; NY366; GA 42,140; FL A1A; CT32; VT 5A; QC 16⒉16⒌263

Flickr: Click the globe under my avatar

TheBox

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 7
  • Location: Houston, TX, United States
  • Last Login: February 04, 2021, 12:39:59 AM
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1759 on: December 09, 2020, 12:20:36 AM »

I am unable to see the above pictures. Anybody else have that problem? Windows 10 laptop.
You can also right click on the picture(s) and "open image in new tab" so you can see them
Logged

TheBox

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 7
  • Location: Houston, TX, United States
  • Last Login: February 04, 2021, 12:39:59 AM
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1760 on: January 28, 2021, 04:07:38 PM »

Any news on the US 59/I-69 expansion in between Richmond-Rosenburg to Beasley and maybe Kendleton?
Logged

Bobby5280

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2399
  • Location: Lawton, OK
  • Last Login: Today at 04:27:06 PM
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1761 on: January 29, 2021, 11:14:41 AM »

Construction is pretty far along on the I-69 segment from Rosenberg on Southwest down to Kendleton.
Logged

Thegeet

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1
  • Location: Port Lavaca, TX
  • Last Login: February 21, 2021, 01:34:09 PM
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1762 on: February 07, 2021, 01:57:39 AM »

Hey guys, I want to upload a few photos of US 59 Construction in victoria from my Android. However, I can't figure out how to attach a file.
Logged

wanderer2575

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1060
  • Location: Farmington Hills, MI
  • Last Login: Today at 05:22:59 PM
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1763 on: February 07, 2021, 02:21:56 AM »

Hey guys, I want to upload a few photos of US 59 Construction in victoria from my Android. However, I can't figure out how to attach a file.

You can't directly attach a photo to a post.  You need to post the photo on a hosting site such as Flickr or Imgur and then include the link to the photo in your post.  Click the "Quote" link on a post with photos to see the syntax to use for the link.
Logged

Life in Paradise

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 384
  • Location: Indiana
  • Last Login: Today at 12:09:24 PM
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1764 on: February 07, 2021, 03:50:45 PM »

Hey guys, I want to upload a few photos of US 59 Construction in victoria from my Android. However, I can't figure out how to attach a file.

You can't directly attach a photo to a post.  You need to post the photo on a hosting site such as Flickr or Imgur and then include the link to the photo in your post.  Click the "Quote" link on a post with photos to see the syntax to use for the link.
I believe there may be a way you can.  Check the topic "Update on I-69 Extension in Indiana", and look for ITB's posts.  It appears he has a way that he has done it, since it doesn't look like he uses a link.
Logged

1

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 9352
  • UMass Lowell student

  • Age: 22
  • Location: MA/NH border
  • Last Login: Today at 08:29:11 PM
    • Flickr account
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1765 on: February 07, 2021, 03:54:09 PM »

Hey guys, I want to upload a few photos of US 59 Construction in victoria from my Android. However, I can't figure out how to attach a file.

You can't directly attach a photo to a post.  You need to post the photo on a hosting site such as Flickr or Imgur and then include the link to the photo in your post.  Click the "Quote" link on a post with photos to see the syntax to use for the link.
I believe there may be a way you can.  Check the topic "Update on I-69 Extension in Indiana", and look for ITB's posts.  It appears he has a way that he has done it, since it doesn't look like he uses a link.

There's a forum gallery, but I don't think everyone has access to it.
Logged
Clinched

Traveled, plus
US ⒔50
MA ⒐2⒉40.9⒐10⒎10⒐1⒒1⒘1⒚14⒈159
NH 27,38,111A(E); CA133; NY366; GA 42,140; FL A1A; CT32; VT 5A; QC 16⒉16⒌263

Flickr: Click the globe under my avatar

rickmastfan67

  • The Invisible One
  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2869
  • I want I-67 in PA!!!!

  • Age: 36
  • Location: Pittsburgh, Pa, USA
  • Last Login: Today at 11:30:11 AM
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1766 on: February 07, 2021, 08:55:31 PM »

Hey guys, I want to upload a few photos of US 59 Construction in victoria from my Android. However, I can't figure out how to attach a file.

You can't directly attach a photo to a post.  You need to post the photo on a hosting site such as Flickr or Imgur and then include the link to the photo in your post.  Click the "Quote" link on a post with photos to see the syntax to use for the link.
I believe there may be a way you can.  Check the topic "Update on I-69 Extension in Indiana", and look for ITB's posts.  It appears he has a way that he has done it, since it doesn't look like he uses a link.

ITB uploads his pictures to Flickr.

Alex

  • Webmaster
  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4928
  • Location: Tampa, FL
  • Last Login: February 11, 2021, 01:22:35 PM
    • AARoads
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1767 on: February 07, 2021, 10:35:32 PM »

Hey guys, I want to upload a few photos of US 59 Construction in victoria from my Android. However, I can't figure out how to attach a file.

You can't directly attach a photo to a post.  You need to post the photo on a hosting site such as Flickr or Imgur and then include the link to the photo in your post.  Click the "Quote" link on a post with photos to see the syntax to use for the link.
I believe there may be a way you can.  Check the topic "Update on I-69 Extension in Indiana", and look for ITB's posts.  It appears he has a way that he has done it, since it doesn't look like he uses a link.

There's a forum gallery, but I don't think everyone has access to it.

A few members requested access so they can upload photos or project graphics. Most members have places where they post their photos and hotlink from. The gallery helps with those who don't have that option, or don't want to create a new account at Flickr or whatnot just to share photos here.

1

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 9352
  • UMass Lowell student

  • Age: 22
  • Location: MA/NH border
  • Last Login: Today at 08:29:11 PM
    • Flickr account
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1768 on: February 08, 2021, 06:43:49 AM »

Hey guys, I want to upload a few photos of US 59 Construction in victoria from my Android. However, I can't figure out how to attach a file.

You can't directly attach a photo to a post.  You need to post the photo on a hosting site such as Flickr or Imgur and then include the link to the photo in your post.  Click the "Quote" link on a post with photos to see the syntax to use for the link.
I believe there may be a way you can.  Check the topic "Update on I-69 Extension in Indiana", and look for ITB's posts.  It appears he has a way that he has done it, since it doesn't look like he uses a link.

There's a forum gallery, but I don't think everyone has access to it.

A few members requested access so they can upload photos or project graphics. Most members have places where they post their photos and hotlink from. The gallery helps with those who don't have that option, or don't want to create a new account at Flickr or whatnot just to share photos here.

Then how did I get access?
Logged
Clinched

Traveled, plus
US ⒔50
MA ⒐2⒉40.9⒐10⒎10⒐1⒒1⒘1⒚14⒈159
NH 27,38,111A(E); CA133; NY366; GA 42,140; FL A1A; CT32; VT 5A; QC 16⒉16⒌263

Flickr: Click the globe under my avatar

kphoger

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 15706
  • Location: Wichita, KS
  • Last Login: Today at 08:29:05 PM
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1769 on: February 08, 2021, 09:58:14 AM »




Hey guys, I want to upload a few photos of US 59 Construction in victoria from my Android. However, I can't figure out how to attach a file.

You can't directly attach a photo to a post.  You need to post the photo on a hosting site such as Flickr or Imgur and then include the link to the photo in your post.  Click the "Quote" link on a post with photos to see the syntax to use for the link.

I believe there may be a way you can.  Check the topic "Update on I-69 Extension in Indiana", and look for ITB's posts.  It appears he has a way that he has done it, since it doesn't look like he uses a link.

ITB uploads his pictures to Flickr.

Yep.

I just checked his most recent post with pictures, and here is the pertinent info:

Code: [Select]
[img width=800 height=533]https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50869355327_e377a55e41_k.jpg[/img]
Code: [Select]
[img width=800 height=1200]https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50868541878_3a7d8eb8ba_k.jpg[/img]
Et cetera.  Those are images hosted on Flickr.
Logged
Keep right except to pass.  Yes.  You.
Visit scenic Orleans County, NY!
Male pronouns, please.

edwaleni

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 975
  • Last Login: Today at 02:18:32 PM
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1770 on: February 08, 2021, 09:43:15 PM »




Hey guys, I want to upload a few photos of US 59 Construction in victoria from my Android. However, I can't figure out how to attach a file.

You can't directly attach a photo to a post.  You need to post the photo on a hosting site such as Flickr or Imgur and then include the link to the photo in your post.  Click the "Quote" link on a post with photos to see the syntax to use for the link.

I believe there may be a way you can.  Check the topic "Update on I-69 Extension in Indiana", and look for ITB's posts.  It appears he has a way that he has done it, since it doesn't look like he uses a link.

ITB uploads his pictures to Flickr.

Yep.

I just checked his most recent post with pictures, and here is the pertinent info:

Code: [Select]
[img width=800 height=533]https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50869355327_e377a55e41_k.jpg[/img]
Code: [Select]
[img width=800 height=1200]https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50868541878_3a7d8eb8ba_k.jpg[/img]
Et cetera.  Those are images hosted on Flickr.

When embedding images from Flickr, use the medium setting when exporting the URL.

Then only use the IMG icon above and remove the other formatting info when embedding the URL in the forum.

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50868541878_3a7d8eb8ba_k.jpg

You should only see this:

 
Logged

1

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 9352
  • UMass Lowell student

  • Age: 22
  • Location: MA/NH border
  • Last Login: Today at 08:29:11 PM
    • Flickr account
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1771 on: February 08, 2021, 09:46:18 PM »

Height above 600 for non-SVG files is discouraged, as it takes longer for the page to load with larger files, plus more scrolling. (Width above 800 is automatically downsized unless it's an SVG, but the forum won't change height automatically.)
Logged
Clinched

Traveled, plus
US ⒔50
MA ⒐2⒉40.9⒐10⒎10⒐1⒒1⒘1⒚14⒈159
NH 27,38,111A(E); CA133; NY366; GA 42,140; FL A1A; CT32; VT 5A; QC 16⒉16⒌263

Flickr: Click the globe under my avatar

debragga

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 148
  • Age: 21
  • Location: Monroe, Louisiana
  • Last Login: February 25, 2021, 01:05:18 PM
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1772 on: February 10, 2021, 10:28:19 AM »

Imgur is the easiest I've used. No account needed, just drag and drop to upload and copy the link.
Logged

Echostatic

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 54
  • Concrete > Asphalt

  • Age: 15
  • Location: Austin, TX
  • Last Login: Today at 01:40:15 PM
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1773 on: February 10, 2021, 11:46:35 AM »

I've also used imgur, for over four years now. Works like a charm although the compression is a little aggressive.

GreenLanternCorps

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 378
  • What's behind me, is not important!

  • Age: 54
  • Location: Ohio
  • Last Login: Today at 07:09:16 AM
Re: I-69 in TX
« Reply #1774 on: February 19, 2021, 08:33:53 AM »

Don't know if this has been referenced before, but while playing around on Google Maps I found some September 2019 photos of construction for Ranch access on I-69E just North of Raymondville...

https://www.google.com/maps/@26.5979191,-97.7669605,3a,75y,16.57h,79.13t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s5RnSs6JQPluYTtfWWLdfww!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
Logged

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.