News:

Am able to again make updates to the Shield Gallery!
- Alex

Main Menu

The Worst of Road Signs

Started by Scott5114, September 21, 2010, 04:01:21 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Takumi

Yeah, my point of that was to say that was a good thing.
Quote from: Rothman on July 15, 2021, 07:52:59 AM
Olive Garden must be stopped.  I must stop them.

Don't @ me. Seriously.


agentsteel53

Quote from: Takumi on January 22, 2014, 11:17:14 AM
Not in Virginia. Their MUTCD supplement completely bans them.
https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=5061.0

we still get more accidental installs there than in, say, Tennessee.  how has Tennessee managed to not have one pop up even by accident since the early 90s?
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

codyg1985

Quote from: agentsteel53 on January 22, 2014, 11:45:35 AM
Quote from: Takumi on January 22, 2014, 11:17:14 AM
Not in Virginia. Their MUTCD supplement completely bans them.
https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=5061.0

we still get more accidental installs there than in, say, Tennessee.  how has Tennessee managed to not have one pop up even by accident since the early 90s?

They sort of did along I-24, but the contractor put Georgia in the shield instead of Tennessee.
Cody Goodman
Huntsville, AL, United States

Zeffy

Quote from: Takumi on January 22, 2014, 09:47:36 AM
On the one hand, state name interstate shield in Virginia likely created after the MUTCD banned it. On the other hand, everything else. Because Virginia Beach.




Life would be boring if we didn't take an offramp every once in a while

A weird combination of a weather geek, roadgeek, car enthusiast and furry mixed with many anxiety related disorders

codyg1985

Quote from: codyg1985 on January 22, 2014, 11:46:42 AM
Quote from: agentsteel53 on January 22, 2014, 11:45:35 AM
Quote from: Takumi on January 22, 2014, 11:17:14 AM
Not in Virginia. Their MUTCD supplement completely bans them.
https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=5061.0

we still get more accidental installs there than in, say, Tennessee.  how has Tennessee managed to not have one pop up even by accident since the early 90s?

They sort of did along I-24, but the contractor put Georgia in the shield instead of Tennessee.

This was at Exit 152 in South Pittsburg, TN:

Cody Goodman
Huntsville, AL, United States

PHLBOS

Quote from: codyg1985 on January 22, 2014, 11:54:55 AM
Quote from: codyg1985 on January 22, 2014, 11:46:42 AM
Quote from: agentsteel53 on January 22, 2014, 11:45:35 AM
Quote from: Takumi on January 22, 2014, 11:17:14 AM
Not in Virginia. Their MUTCD supplement completely bans them.
https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=5061.0

we still get more accidental installs there than in, say, Tennessee.  how has Tennessee managed to not have one pop up even by accident since the early 90s?
They sort of did along I-24, but the contractor put Georgia in the shield instead of Tennessee.

This was at Exit 152 in South Pittsburg, TN:


That pic should be posted in the Erroneous road signs thread.
GPS does NOT equal GOD

Takumi

Quote from: agentsteel53 on January 22, 2014, 11:45:35 AM
Quote from: Takumi on January 22, 2014, 11:17:14 AM
Not in Virginia. Their MUTCD supplement completely bans them.
https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=5061.0

we still get more accidental installs there than in, say, Tennessee.  how has Tennessee managed to not have one pop up even by accident since the early 90s?

I guess because Virginia has so many independent cities that, for the most part, do their own thing with signage. Most of it is terrible (see Virginia Beach, Norfolk, Suffolk since they took over their own maintenance in 2006, Hopewell, to name just a few), but then you have isolated moments of genius, like the normal-looking state-name I-264 shield at the oceanfront, and Newport News and Williamsburg still using cutout-era spec signage to this day, albeit on unisigns.
Quote from: Rothman on July 15, 2021, 07:52:59 AM
Olive Garden must be stopped.  I must stop them.

Don't @ me. Seriously.

agentsteel53

damn!!!  that contractor error was this close to being a necessary thing in the state of Tennessee.

how is it that I know of two old-style TENN triangle shields, and three old-style TENN-US shields... and not a single interstate?
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

hbelkins

Last state-named Tennessee interstate sign I remember seeing was on the southbound approach to I-40's Exit 407, at TN 66 (the Gatlinburg/Sevierville/Pigeon Forge exit). The signs were there in the late 1990s but I didn't get a photo. They've since disappeared.
Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

vdeane

Quote from: codyg1985 on January 22, 2014, 11:46:42 AM
Quote from: agentsteel53 on January 22, 2014, 11:45:35 AM
Quote from: Takumi on January 22, 2014, 11:17:14 AM
Not in Virginia. Their MUTCD supplement completely bans them.
https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=5061.0

we still get more accidental installs there than in, say, Tennessee.  how has Tennessee managed to not have one pop up even by accident since the early 90s?

They sort of did along I-24, but the contractor put Georgia in the shield instead of Tennessee.
Maybe that sign was meant to be further east?
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

codyg1985

^ It was installed as part of the rebuild of the interchange with US 72. I think either the contractor or TDOT has since either replaced the shield or taped over the Georgia part.
Cody Goodman
Huntsville, AL, United States

agentsteel53

Quote from: hbelkins on January 22, 2014, 03:22:35 PM
Last state-named Tennessee interstate sign I remember seeing was on the southbound approach to I-40's Exit 407, at TN 66 (the Gatlinburg/Sevierville/Pigeon Forge exit). The signs were there in the late 1990s but I didn't get a photo. They've since disappeared.

the last one I saw was on I-640 westbound, at the western end as it merged with I-40.  the assembly said WEST 640 TO 40, and one (I can't remember which!) was state-named.  this was on January 1, 2005.
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

hbelkins

Where are the TENN triangles and the TENN-US signs you reference? I have personally seen the TN 99 in Hohenwald and the US 25E in Cumberland Gap.
Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

US 41

Visited States and Provinces:
USA (48)= All of Lower 48
Canada (5)= NB, NS, ON, PEI, QC
Mexico (9)= BCN, BCS, CHIH, COAH, DGO, NL, SON, SIN, TAM

vtk

Wait, it's all Ohio? Always has been.

AsphaltPlanet

Poor sign layout on this sign:
AsphaltPlanet.ca  Youtube -- Opinions expressed reflect the viewpoints of others.

agentsteel53

Quote from: hbelkins on January 22, 2014, 08:10:18 PM
Where are the TENN triangles and the TENN-US signs you reference? I have personally seen the TN 99 in Hohenwald and the US 25E in Cumberland Gap.

the others:

Memphis.  mainline 78 eastbound, exactly where you'd think they are:


I forget which town, but it is on the old drag.  not tough to find.  since this photo was taken, they righted the gantry so it is all properly rectilinear.
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

agentsteel53

Quote from: AsphaltPlanet on January 23, 2014, 05:02:31 PM
Poor sign layout on this sign:
[express]

is this implying that the ramp to the express lanes is the #1 lane, and (optionally), the #2?  because if so, the sign is indeed poorly done: it makes it look like the #2 is optionally the express (bear right) or who knows where (bear left).
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

sammi

#3043
Quote from: agentsteel53 on January 23, 2014, 05:23:00 PM
Quote from: AsphaltPlanet on January 23, 2014, 05:02:31 PM
Poor sign layout on this sign:
[express]

is this implying that the ramp to the express lanes is the #1 lane, and (optionally), the #2?  because if so, the sign is indeed poorly done: it makes it look like the #2 is optionally the express (bear right) or who knows where (bear left).

Lanes 1 and 2 go to Express. 1 is exit only (hence the bilingual panel), 2 is an option lane. Bear left, express; keep straight, collectors. Ontario always does it that way.

That said, AsphaltPlanet was probably referring to the other sign.

This is why the DVP needs an actual shield.

[404] [DVP]
Downtown
Newmarket

Brandon

^^ The MTO could take a page from MDOT and rearrange the sign to read:

{404} Newmarket
Don Valley Pkwy

on two separate lines.
"If you think this has a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention." - Ramsay Bolton, "Game of Thrones"

"Symbolic of his struggle against reality." - Reg, "Monty Python's Life of Brian"

AsphaltPlanet

^ I don't know why they didn't.  The current layout of the sign defies common sense.
AsphaltPlanet.ca  Youtube -- Opinions expressed reflect the viewpoints of others.

Alps

Quote from: agentsteel53 on January 23, 2014, 05:21:56 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on January 22, 2014, 08:10:18 PM
Where are the TENN triangles and the TENN-US signs you reference? I have personally seen the TN 99 in Hohenwald and the US 25E in Cumberland Gap.

the others:

Memphis.  mainline 78 eastbound, exactly where you'd think they are:


I forget which town, but it is on the old drag.  not tough to find.  since this photo was taken, they righted the gantry so it is all properly rectilinear.

For the latter - Englewood Rd., Madisonville?
As for the 25E in Cumberland Gap, which I've seen in several iterations and I know to be in shitty condition - exactly where in the Gap is it? I'll be there fairly soon.

NE2

Quote from: Steve on January 23, 2014, 09:57:58 PM
As for the 25E in Cumberland Gap, which I've seen in several iterations and I know to be in shitty condition - exactly where in the Gap is it? I'll be there fairly soon.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Old_US_25E_sign.jpg has lat/long.
pre-1945 Florida route log

I accept and respect your identity as long as it's not dumb shit like "identifying as a vaccinated attack helicopter".

1995hoo

Quote from: agentsteel53 on January 23, 2014, 05:23:00 PM
Quote from: AsphaltPlanet on January 23, 2014, 05:02:31 PM
Poor sign layout on this sign:
[express]

is this implying that the ramp to the express lanes is the #1 lane, and (optionally), the #2?  because if so, the sign is indeed poorly done: it makes it look like the #2 is optionally the express (bear right) or who knows where (bear left).

Others have hinted at it but haven't said it straight out: The Don Valley Parkway is not part of Route 404. They act as continuations of each other on either side of 401, but they carry separate designations. Yet the sign implies that 404 will lead you to the DVP somewhere downstream.

Regarding the sign for the express lanes, it's not really ambiguous if you know the road because they use European-style blue signs over the collector lanes (in the US we'd probably call them "local" lanes) and American-style green signs over the express lanes. So the blue signs tell you you're in the local lanes. Like so many things, it's a lot easier to follow in person than it is in a still photograph.
"You know, you never have a guaranteed spot until you have a spot guaranteed."
—Olaf Kolzig, as quoted in the Washington Times on March 28, 2003,
commenting on the Capitals clinching a playoff spot.

"That sounded stupid, didn't it?"
—Kolzig, to the same reporter a few seconds later.

agentsteel53

Quote from: 1995hoo on January 24, 2014, 07:47:36 AMThe Don Valley Parkway is not part of Route 404.

sounds like CA-56 and the Ted Williams Parkway.  it would probably make more sense if they renamed the whole shebang as both 404 and the Don Valley Parkway. 

again, route naming and numbering is supposed to be an aid to navigation.  precisely whom does it help to have something abruptly change in the middle like that?
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.