News:

Cloudflare is enabled due to bots continuing to hammer the Forum.

Main Menu

AASHTO Fall 2025 Meeting (Salt Lake City, UT)

Started by Great Lakes Roads, November 07, 2025, 04:48:57 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Alex

I searched the Oklahoma Transportation Commission Meeting Agendas and found both Interstate Agenda Items.

The April 7, 2025 document includes the recommended approval for Interstate 644 (PDF page 49).

QuoteAdd the designation of I-644 to a 32.79-mile stretch of Turnpike known as the Creek Turnpike, beginning west of Tulsa at the Junction of I-44 and the Creek Turnpike and continuing to the east of Tulsa at the Junction of I-44 and the Creek Turnpike.



The May 5, 2025 document includes the recommended approval for Interstate 353 (PDF page 31):

QuoteAdd the designation of I-343 to a 52.31-mile stretch of Turnpike known as the Muskogee Turnpike, beginning at the Junction of the Creek Turnpike and the Muskogee Turnpike and continuing south to the junction of the Muskogee Turnpike and I-40.




PColumbus73

Quote from: GaryV on December 09, 2025, 07:42:37 AM
Quote from: TBKS1 on December 08, 2025, 08:16:19 PMit'll be pretty funny seeing people absolutely lose their shit over the I-343 designation lol

Nah, we'll just have a bunch of posts about how to get I-43 routed all the way down from Wisconsin.



I-44 and I-36 in NC didn't get approved, but they rubber stamped I-343?

wanderer2575

Must be something about the number.  I'm still WTFing about the new M-343 designation outside Kalamazoo, MI.

Max Rockatansky

Probably few would care if the number was 340.  With 343 a great many of you now have something to talk about for years to come.

PColumbus73

Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 09, 2025, 09:57:19 AMProbably few would care if the number was 340.  With 343 a great many of you now have something to talk about for years to come.

I look forward to I-343 consuming the AARoads boards for many years to come!

TBKS1

Quote from: PColumbus73 on December 09, 2025, 10:02:36 AM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 09, 2025, 09:57:19 AMProbably few would care if the number was 340.  With 343 a great many of you now have something to talk about for years to come.

I look forward to I-343 consuming the AARoads boards for many years to come!

I look forward to the day it gets signed, I'll definitely be making the four hour drive to Tulsa once I hear that it's signed. Also get to add it to some additional highway photo projects that I have going on as well.
~ Ethan S. Hester

Travel Mapping page: https://travelmapping.net/user/?units=miles&u=TBKS1
mob-rule: https://www.mob-rule.com/user-gifs/USA/tbks1.gif
Route shield photo log page: (link)

ElishaGOtis

When was the last time the FHWA denied something that AASHTO approved?
I can drive 55 ONLY when it makes sense.

NOTE: Opinions expressed here on AARoads are solely my own and do not represent or reflect the statements, opinions, or decisions of any agency. Any official information I share will be quoted or specified from another source.

My ideal speed limits (FAKE/FICTIONAL NOT OFFICIAL) :
https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?mid=1Ia4RR_BaYyzgJq4n3JcYzkNZjLYKzGQ

kurumi

Quote from: bugo on December 08, 2025, 07:59:59 PM
Quote from: Rover_0 on December 08, 2025, 07:32:02 PMI got a Final report PDF back from the USRN, though we're waiting on the individual applications (which were said to be done at the end of last week, but nothing yet). I have the link in Google Drive, hopefully it works:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1adbUO0G03pa8O5Iqncp5Prl

There is some questionable grammar and poor wording all over this PDF file.

From Item 10:

QuoteEstablish new Interstate to be a junction off I-44.

Huh?

The timeline checks out:
2025-11-12: most recent Fr*tz*wl post on this forum
2025-11-17: start of AASHTO fall meeting

Our colleague evidently has a new gig (and he knows the docs need a little more justification than "this is needed")
My first SF/horror short story collection is available: "Young Man, Open Your Winter Eye"

BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/therealkurumi.bsky.social

hbelkins

#58
Quote from: Mapmikey on December 08, 2025, 08:07:05 PMWest Virginia requests its first BUSINESS route...US 52 for Bluefield

Keeping the existing  US 52 routing and putting the business route on other existing city streets, or routing US 52 across new WV 108 and putting the business route on the existing mainline?

To address the question of business routes in West Virginia, there have been some state route designations in the past. I'm most familiar with Business WV 34 in Hurricane, although most of the BUSINESS banners have been changed to ALT.

And FHWA will have final jurisdiction over I-343. Didn't FHWA reject North Carolina's original proposal for what became I-87?
Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

74/171FAN

QuoteDidn't FHWA reject North Carolina's original proposal for what became I-87?

Yes, NCDOT had originally requested I-89 for I-87 and I-36 for I-42.
I am now a PennDOT employee.  My opinions/views do not necessarily reflect the opinions/views of PennDOT.

Travel Mapping: https://travelmapping.net/user/?units=miles&u=markkos1992
Mob-Rule:  https://mob-rule.com/user/markkos1992

formulanone

I-644, uh ok

I-343, typo or send in the clowns

WillWeaverRVA

Quote from: formulanone on December 09, 2025, 02:39:07 PMI-644, uh ok

I-343, typo or send in the clowns

The more I look at it the more I'm convinced it was meant to be I-340 but it was never corrected because Oklahoma
Will Weaver
WillWeaverRVA Photography | Twitter

"But how will the oxen know where to drown if we renumber the Oregon Trail?" - NE2

CNGL-Leudimin

I-343, what the freak? It's nowhere near I-43, not even in Wisconsin (the only state that should have it given it's also the only state I-43 runs through). I hope they meant I-340.

Also, I see some Pennsylvania items turned down. I wonder when was the last time that happened.
Supporter of the construction of several running gags, including I-366 with a speed limit of 85 mph (137 km/h) and the Hypotenuse.

Please note that I may mention "invalid" FM channels, i.e. ending in an even number or down to 87.5. These are valid in Europe.

Mapmikey

Quote from: hbelkins on December 09, 2025, 01:41:10 PM
Quote from: Mapmikey on December 08, 2025, 08:07:05 PMWest Virginia requests its first BUSINESS route...US 52 for Bluefield

Keeping the existing  US 52 routing and putting the business route on other existing city streets, or routing US 52 across new WV 108 and putting the business route on the existing mainline?

To address the question of business routes in West Virginia, there have been some state route designations in the past. I'm most familiar with Business WV 34 in Hurricane, although most of the BUSINESS banners have been changed to ALT.

And FHWA will have final jurisdiction over I-343. Didn't FHWA reject North Carolina's original proposal for what became I-87?

US 52 is replacing WV 108 and part of WV 123.

34 Business is almost certainly a posting error and the only state route business posting I am aware of.

Great Lakes Roads

Quote from: TBKS1 on December 08, 2025, 08:16:19 PMRegarding US 64 Business being removed in Arkansas, which section is it? I'm not seeing which section this is, I'd assume it's either Mulberry, Earle, or Crawfordsville as I could see those sections as being otherwise useless.

It's the one in Alma.
-Jay Seaburg

Clinched States (Interstates): AL, AZ, DE, FL, HI, KS, MN, NE, NH, RI, VT, WI

formulanone

Quote from: WillWeaverRVA on December 09, 2025, 02:53:10 PM
Quote from: formulanone on December 09, 2025, 02:39:07 PMI-644, uh ok

I-343, typo or send in the clowns

The more I look at it the more I'm convinced it was meant to be I-340 but it was never corrected because Oklahoma

I honestly hope "343" gets posted in the field to annoy the purists. It'll make for another interesting piece of road-lore.

GaryV

To add more to the I-343 nonsense, if it goes from the new I-644 to I-30, shouldn't it be an even 3di?

hotdogPi

Quote from: GaryV on December 09, 2025, 06:00:59 PMTo add more to the I-343 nonsense, if it goes from the new I-644 to I-30, shouldn't it be an even 3di?


Notwithstanding your proposed extension to Texarkana, it's radial out of Tulsa and doesn't act like a beltway. An odd first digit is correct.
Clinched

Traveled, plus
US 13, 50
MA 35, 40, 53, 63, 79, 109, 126, 138, 141, 151, 159
NH 78, 111A(E); CA 90; NY 40, 366; CT 32, 193, 320; VT 2A, 5A; PA 3, 39, 51, 60; GA 42, 140; FL A1A, 7; WA 202; QC 162, 165, 263; 🇬🇧A100, A3211, A3213, A3215; 🇫🇷95 D316

Lowest untraveled: 36

GaryV

Quote from: hotdogPi on December 09, 2025, 06:03:15 PM
Quote from: GaryV on December 09, 2025, 06:00:59 PMTo add more to the I-343 nonsense, if it goes from the new I-644 to I-30, shouldn't it be an even 3di?


Notwithstanding your proposed extension to Texarkana, it's radial out of Tulsa and doesn't act like a beltway. An odd first digit is correct.

Sorry, typo. From I-40 to new I-644.

Big John

Is I-343 named from the same people who named US 163?

Avalanchez71

I-343 is just another abominable and just dismal disgusting rubber stamp.  They should have used I-340 or really an even number could work since it goes to another interstate.  They could have even made it a northern section of I-37.

WillWeaverRVA

Quote from: Avalanchez71 on December 09, 2025, 06:12:25 PMI-343 is just another abominable and just dismal disgusting rubber stamp.  They should have used I-340 or really an even number could work since it goes to another interstate.  They could have even made it a northern section of I-37.

It functions as a spur to Tulsa from I-40, so the odd number is correct. It really should be I-340.
Will Weaver
WillWeaverRVA Photography | Twitter

"But how will the oxen know where to drown if we renumber the Oregon Trail?" - NE2

Molandfreak

Is the Broken Arrow Expressway up to Interstate standards? I-343 isn't much of a spur if it requires following at least two other highways to reach the heart of Tulsa.

Inclusive infrastructure advocate

Revive 755

Quote from: PColumbus73 on December 09, 2025, 10:02:36 AMI look forward to I-343 consuming the AARoads boards for many years to come!

Depends how much attention North Carolina is paying.  Now that there's a growing precedent for random unconnected interstate numbers there's more potential for them to compensate for being low on even I-x85's and I-x40's.

oscar

Quote from: Molandfreak on December 09, 2025, 07:26:20 PMIs the Broken Arrow Expressway up to Interstate standards? I-343 isn't much of a spur if it requires following at least two other highways to reach the heart of Tulsa.

With the new I-644, it does at least connect I-40 to another Interstate.

I-580 in California doesn't reach the heart (or any other part) of San Francisco. After intersecting with I-238, and passing through "there's no there there" Oakland, it skips around San Francisco to end in suburban Marin County.
my Hot Springs and Highways pages, with links to my roads sites:
http://www.alaskaroads.com/home.html