News:

While the Forum is up and running, there are still thousands of guests (bots). Downtime may occur as a result.
- Alex

Main Menu

Substandard Interchanges

Started by silverback1065, December 16, 2019, 10:27:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

kphoger

meh.

WB I-72 @ Springfield, IL – same deal, have to follow a loop ramp

NB I-44 @ Fidelity, MO – same deal, have to follow a loop ramp

SB Ave of the Saints @ Clear Lake, IA – at least it gets a c/d lane

He Is Already Here! Let's Go, Flamingo!
Dost thou understand the graveness of the circumstances?
Deut 23:13
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: PKDIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.


hbelkins

Quote from: paulthemapguy on December 24, 2019, 12:27:28 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on December 17, 2019, 04:11:28 PM
The I-55 northbound cloverleaf in Memphis.

In the same vein is the I-74/I-80 interchange in Illinois, where you need to navigate a cloverleaf to continue on your interstate of choice (74 or 80).

I always found it odd that the I-74/I-80 interchange is OK, but Kentucky was required to rebuild the I-24/Purchase and WK/Pennyrile interchanges in order to sign I-69.
Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

vdeane

Quote from: hbelkins on December 24, 2019, 04:17:19 PM
Quote from: paulthemapguy on December 24, 2019, 12:27:28 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on December 17, 2019, 04:11:28 PM
The I-55 northbound cloverleaf in Memphis.

In the same vein is the I-74/I-80 interchange in Illinois, where you need to navigate a cloverleaf to continue on your interstate of choice (74 or 80).

I always found it odd that the I-74/I-80 interchange is OK, but Kentucky was required to rebuild the I-24/Purchase and WK/Pennyrile interchanges in order to sign I-69.
Or the I-69/I-55 interchange in Mississippi.  I presume I-74/I-80 is older, but I-69/I-55 can't be too different in age from those Kentucky interchanges.
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

sprjus4

#53
Quote from: vdeane on December 24, 2019, 04:33:19 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on December 24, 2019, 04:17:19 PM
Quote from: paulthemapguy on December 24, 2019, 12:27:28 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on December 17, 2019, 04:11:28 PM
The I-55 northbound cloverleaf in Memphis.

In the same vein is the I-74/I-80 interchange in Illinois, where you need to navigate a cloverleaf to continue on your interstate of choice (74 or 80).

I always found it odd that the I-74/I-80 interchange is OK, but Kentucky was required to rebuild the I-24/Purchase and WK/Pennyrile interchanges in order to sign I-69.
Or the I-69/I-55 interchange in Mississippi.  I presume I-74/I-80 is older, but I-69/I-55 can't be too different in age from those Kentucky interchanges.
Or the I-73/I-85 interchange in North Carolina. Signed through there about 2006 - 2008, and I-73 North traverses a single-lane 25 mph loop ramp.

IMO, all of these interchanges should have been rebuilt / designed to accommodate the through movement. At least by the FHWA requiring Kentucky to rebuild three interchanges to accommodate I-69, it's now properly equipped unlike the others to handle long distance traffic.

mgk920

Quote from: Revive 755 on December 17, 2019, 11:19:04 PM
For Illinois (not an exhaustive list)
* I-90 at I-39:  Particularly the low speed WB to SB ramp that dumps out onto the left side of I-39
* I-39 at US 20, western interchange:  Mainline I-39 goes through long single lane ramps
* I-94 at US 41 near the Wisconsin border:  Left side exit to SB US 41
* I-290 at Austin Avenue
* I-290 at IL 43
* I-290 at IL 171
* Palatine Road near Wolf Road:  The WB entrance could use a longer acceleration lane

I-94 (Edens Expressway) merge from the outbound Kennedy (I-90/94) Express lanes - a scary short left merge.

Mike

froggie

Quote from: hbelkins on December 24, 2019, 04:17:19 PM
Quote from: paulthemapguy on December 24, 2019, 12:27:28 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on December 17, 2019, 04:11:28 PM
The I-55 northbound cloverleaf in Memphis.

In the same vein is the I-74/I-80 interchange in Illinois, where you need to navigate a cloverleaf to continue on your interstate of choice (74 or 80).

I always found it odd that the I-74/I-80 interchange is OK, but Kentucky was required to rebuild the I-24/Purchase and WK/Pennyrile interchanges in order to sign I-69.

74/80 was built with Interstate funds according to the design standards of the day, so it gets grandfathered in.  Pretty sure WK/Pennyrile had to be rebuilt due to the ramp & taper designs used in its original construction.  And since 69 is a much newer designation, it has to meet the more recent design standards unlike 74/80.

While 24/Purchase was also technically built with Interstate-of-the-day, FHWA likely required upgrading because of 69 being a new designation.

ErmineNotyours

#56
Quote from: wanderer2575 on December 24, 2019, 08:55:50 AM
I-75 at M-21 in Flint.  Guess which side of the interchange had a problem with ROW acquisition.  Very dangerous going southbound; the speed limit is 70 while the acceleration lane is nowhere near long enough, considering the slow speed at which vehicles are forced to enter.

https://goo.gl/maps/qVtzq7u7M1vp8qDLA

At least Flint has a movie theater now.  Speaking of Flint, one cloverleaf didn't have enough merge space to get on the freeway, so they leveled it to make a reverse jughandle for using the ramp across the street.  You get to wait and go through the intersection twice.  They've since reconfigured the interchange again but you can see where it used to be.

Wollchet Drive & SR 16, Gig Harbor: very tight turns near the end that you have to slow down for before accelerating, on BOTH onramps.  Further north are simple northbound-only T-intersections for a business access and a cemetery, so they're not going for Interstate standards anyway.

Flint1979

Quote from: ErmineNotyours on December 25, 2019, 09:43:27 PM
Quote from: wanderer2575 on December 24, 2019, 08:55:50 AM
I-75 at M-21 in Flint.  Guess which side of the interchange had a problem with ROW acquisition.  Very dangerous going southbound; the speed limit is 70 while the acceleration lane is nowhere near long enough, considering the slow speed at which vehicles are forced to enter.

https://goo.gl/maps/qVtzq7u7M1vp8qDLA

At least Flint has a movie theater now.  Speaking of Flint, one cloverleaf didn't have enough merge space to get on the freeway, so they leveled it to make a reverse jughandle for using the ramp across the street.  You get to wait and go through the intersection twice.  They've since reconfigured the interchange again but you can see where it used to be.

Wollchet Drive & SR 16, Gig Harbor: very tight turns near the end that you have to slow down for before accelerating, on BOTH onramps.  Further north are simple northbound-only T-intersections for a business access and a cemetery, so they're not going for Interstate standards anyway.
When has Flint not had a movie theater?

mgk920

Quote from: Flint1979 on December 26, 2019, 09:57:15 AM
Quote from: ErmineNotyours on December 25, 2019, 09:43:27 PM
Quote from: wanderer2575 on December 24, 2019, 08:55:50 AM
I-75 at M-21 in Flint.  Guess which side of the interchange had a problem with ROW acquisition.  Very dangerous going southbound; the speed limit is 70 while the acceleration lane is nowhere near long enough, considering the slow speed at which vehicles are forced to enter.

https://goo.gl/maps/qVtzq7u7M1vp8qDLA

At least Flint has a movie theater now.  Speaking of Flint, one cloverleaf didn't have enough merge space to get on the freeway, so they leveled it to make a reverse jughandle for using the ramp across the street.  You get to wait and go through the intersection twice.  They've since reconfigured the interchange again but you can see where it used to be.

Wollchet Drive & SR 16, Gig Harbor: very tight turns near the end that you have to slow down for before accelerating, on BOTH onramps.  Further north are simple northbound-only T-intersections for a business access and a cemetery, so they're not going for Interstate standards anyway.
When has Flint not had a movie theater?

Maybe the *City* of Flint, and not any of its suburbs?

Mike

ErmineNotyours

Quote from: Flint1979 on December 26, 2019, 09:57:15 AM
Quote from: ErmineNotyours on December 25, 2019, 09:43:27 PM
Quote from: wanderer2575 on December 24, 2019, 08:55:50 AM
I-75 at M-21 in Flint.  Guess which side of the interchange had a problem with ROW acquisition.  Very dangerous going southbound; the speed limit is 70 while the acceleration lane is nowhere near long enough, considering the slow speed at which vehicles are forced to enter.

https://goo.gl/maps/qVtzq7u7M1vp8qDLA

At least Flint has a movie theater now.  Speaking of Flint, one cloverleaf didn't have enough merge space to get on the freeway, so they leveled it to make a reverse jughandle for using the ramp across the street.  You get to wait and go through the intersection twice.  They've since reconfigured the interchange again but you can see where it used to be.

Wollchet Drive & SR 16, Gig Harbor: very tight turns near the end that you have to slow down for before accelerating, on BOTH onramps.  Further north are simple northbound-only T-intersections for a business access and a cemetery, so they're not going for Interstate standards anyway.
When has Flint not had a movie theater?
The end of the movie Roger and Me has the quote, "This movie can not be shown in Flint.  All the movie theaters have closed."  I guess things have improved such that they can show it, so there's some improvement.

vdeane

Quote from: froggie on December 25, 2019, 09:20:26 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on December 24, 2019, 04:17:19 PM
Quote from: paulthemapguy on December 24, 2019, 12:27:28 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on December 17, 2019, 04:11:28 PM
The I-55 northbound cloverleaf in Memphis.

In the same vein is the I-74/I-80 interchange in Illinois, where you need to navigate a cloverleaf to continue on your interstate of choice (74 or 80).

I always found it odd that the I-74/I-80 interchange is OK, but Kentucky was required to rebuild the I-24/Purchase and WK/Pennyrile interchanges in order to sign I-69.

74/80 was built with Interstate funds according to the design standards of the day, so it gets grandfathered in.  Pretty sure WK/Pennyrile had to be rebuilt due to the ramp & taper designs used in its original construction.  And since 69 is a much newer designation, it has to meet the more recent design standards unlike 74/80.

While 24/Purchase was also technically built with Interstate-of-the-day, FHWA likely required upgrading because of 69 being a new designation.

Which begs the question... why did I-69 need to meet modern standards in Kentucky, but not in Mississippi?
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

froggie

#61
^ Unless there's something I missed (and please point out specifics), it did meet standards in Mississippi.  By definition, the cloverleaf at 55/69/269 is not substandard....it meets all the modern design standards for an Interstate cloverleaf interchange...ramp widths, tapers, the whole nine yards.

The WK/Pennyrile interchange did not fully meet those standards...I'm not certain on 24/Purchase.  KTC simply opted to go with direct movements as part of the upgrade.

vdeane

Is it not true that interstates are no longer allowed to follow single-lane loop ramps?
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

TheHighwayMan3561

I don't know if they're "substandard" in the strictest sense but the interchanges I like driving through least around here are US 169's interchanges with 63rd Ave, Medicine Lake Road, and Cedar Lake Road. Short exit ramps, short on-ramps with short acceleration lanes.

TheGrassGuy

Quote from: vdeane on December 27, 2019, 08:50:12 PM
Is it not true that interstates are no longer allowed to follow single-lane loop ramps?
Still better than I-55 in Memphis  :bigass:
If you ever feel useless, remember that CR 504 exists.

froggie

Quote from: vdeane on December 27, 2019, 08:50:12 PM
Is it not true that interstates are no longer allowed to follow single-lane loop ramps?

Was that set as a rule to begin with?  Rationale with 55/69/269 may also be that you have 269 continuing as a mainline east of 55.

Revive 755

Quote from: froggie on December 31, 2019, 06:18:30 PM
Quote from: vdeane on December 27, 2019, 08:50:12 PM
Is it not true that interstates are no longer allowed to follow single-lane loop ramps?

Was that set as a rule to begin with?  Rationale with 55/69/269 may also be that you have 269 continuing as a mainline east of 55.

I certainly recall hearing of it as justification for the elaborate ramps for the I-69/Pennyrile/Western Kentucky interchange.  After all, there is a mainline parkway continuing east where I-69 turns north in Kentucky.

If there is such a rule, it probably has something to due with the attentiveness of the various FHWA state/division offices.

Quote from: kphogerNB I-44 @ Fidelity, MO – same deal, have to follow a loop ramp

I think you meant I-49.  IIRC there were proposals to have I-49 replace MO 249 and part of MO 171, which would eliminate this one.  How the interchange at the I-49/MO 171 gets done will be interesting to watch.

sprjus4

Quote from: froggie on December 31, 2019, 06:18:30 PM
Quote from: vdeane on December 27, 2019, 08:50:12 PM
Is it not true that interstates are no longer allowed to follow single-lane loop ramps?

Was that set as a rule to begin with?
It's almost like the theory certain people believe that left exits are prohibited on the interstate highways... it's perceived as substandard, but there's no rule against it.

Beltway

Quote from: sprjus4 on December 31, 2019, 06:54:57 PM
It's almost like the theory certain people believe that left exits are prohibited on the interstate highways... it's perceived as substandard, but there's no rule against it.

They are prohibited by sound engineering judgement.
http://www.roadstothefuture.com
http://www.capital-beltway.com

Baloney is a reserved word on the Internet
    (Robert  Coté, 2002)

cl94

Re: cloverleaf interchanges, I thought the rule was that they were allowed in new construction on Interstates, but C/D roads are required. 55/69/269 and 73/85 both meet this, while 69/Pennyrile/WK did not. KYTC probably decided to add direct ramps to better handle traffic loads instead of retrofitting the existing interchange.
Please note: All posts represent my personal opinions and do not represent those of my employer or any of its partner agencies.

cpzilliacus

#70
Interstate 895 in Baltimore, Maryland is almost entirely pre-Interstate design, and it shows in the interchanges.  Here are some of the ramps (this is not a complete list):

Southbound only Exit 3 to Inner Loop I-695 (very sharp ramp);

Northbound entrance from northbound MD-295 (sharp ramp);

Extremely sharp loop ramp from I-895 southbound to Potee Street (Potee Street is MD-2, but is not signed here);

Sharp ramp to Shell Road southbound; and

Sharp ramps from eastbound U.S. 40 and Erdman Avenue to southbound I-895.
Opinions expressed here on AAROADS are strictly personal and mine alone, and do not reflect policies or positions of MWCOG, NCRTPB or their member federal, state, county and municipal governments or any other agency.

sprjus4

Quote from: Beltway on December 31, 2019, 08:50:45 PM
Quote from: sprjus4 on December 31, 2019, 06:54:57 PM
It's almost like the theory certain people believe that left exits are prohibited on the interstate highways... it's perceived as substandard, but there's no rule against it.

They are prohibited by sound engineering judgement.
But it is not against interstate standards.

tolbs17

Quote from: sprjus4 on January 01, 2020, 01:05:01 AM
Quote from: Beltway on December 31, 2019, 08:50:45 PM
Quote from: sprjus4 on December 31, 2019, 06:54:57 PM
It's almost like the theory certain people believe that left exits are prohibited on the interstate highways... it's perceived as substandard, but there's no rule against it.

They are prohibited by sound engineering judgement.
But it is not against interstate standards.
It meets basic interstate standards, so that's all it matters.

sprjus4

Quote from: tolbs17 on January 01, 2020, 01:19:21 AM
Quote from: sprjus4 on January 01, 2020, 01:05:01 AM
Quote from: Beltway on December 31, 2019, 08:50:45 PM
Quote from: sprjus4 on December 31, 2019, 06:54:57 PM
It's almost like the theory certain people believe that left exits are prohibited on the interstate highways... it's perceived as substandard, but there's no rule against it.

They are prohibited by sound engineering judgement.
But it is not against interstate standards.
It meets basic interstate standards, so that's all it matters.
I'm not advocating for keeping left exits, but it's not prohibiting an interstate highway from being designated.

tolbs17

Quote from: sprjus4 on January 01, 2020, 01:21:57 AM
Quote from: tolbs17 on January 01, 2020, 01:19:21 AM
Quote from: sprjus4 on January 01, 2020, 01:05:01 AM
Quote from: Beltway on December 31, 2019, 08:50:45 PM
Quote from: sprjus4 on December 31, 2019, 06:54:57 PM
It's almost like the theory certain people believe that left exits are prohibited on the interstate highways... it's perceived as substandard, but there's no rule against it.

They are prohibited by sound engineering judgement.
But it is not against interstate standards.
It meets basic interstate standards, so that's all it matters.
I'm not advocating for keeping left exits, but it's not prohibiting an interstate highway from being designated.
Take a look at I-40 Business in Winston-Salem.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.