News:

Check out the AARoads Wiki!

Main Menu

I-276 in New Jersey?

Started by Michael in Philly, June 19, 2012, 12:20:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Michael in Philly

Hello all -

Last time I was on the New Jersey Turnpike (northbound), I noticed that the signage at exit 6A, which seemed fairly new, marked the Pennsylvania Turnpike connector as I-276, without a "to."  (This was a couple of weeks ago and I don't remember what else was on the sign - might just be "I-276" with "Penna Tpk" as control destination.)  Has the designation been officially extended into New Jersey now?
RIP Dad 1924-2012.


akotchi

No, and it never will be.

Do the panels that you saw have the I-276 shield toward the right of the panel?

If so . . . The signs currently display West/276/Penn Turnpike.  (The new southbound ones at the interchange are already up.)  There are green patches on the panels where other (future) elements are covered, such as I-95 South and Philadelphia.  Within that covered area is the word "to".

The I-276 designation still ends at the Pa side of the state line in the river, but this end will, in a few years, move further west when I-95 takes over the Extension and the eastern few miles of the Pa Turnpike.
Opinions here attributed to me are mine alone and do not reflect those of my employer or the agencies for which I am contracted to do work.

YankeesFan

not that it matters now because of I-95 but why wasn't it designated as I-276? NJ seems like it is so anti-interstate.

TXtoNJ

Quote from: YankeesFan on June 19, 2012, 06:16:37 PM
not that it matters now because of I-95 but why wasn't it designated as I-276? NJ seems like it is so anti-interstate.

Think it was because it had no direct connection to any interstate before the addition of turnpike mileage to I-95 north of Exit 6.

Alps

Quote from: TXtoNJ on June 19, 2012, 06:29:36 PM
Quote from: YankeesFan on June 19, 2012, 06:16:37 PM
not that it matters now because of I-95 but why wasn't it designated as I-276? NJ seems like it is so anti-interstate.

Think it was because it had no direct connection to any interstate before the addition of turnpike mileage to I-95 north of Exit 6.
Devil's advocate time: so why wasn't I-276 extended up to Exit 7A to end at I-195? It could even have ended at US 206 at Exit 7, or EVEN 130 at Exit 6A. State line makes less sense than a US or I- highway.

qguy

Quote from: Steve on June 19, 2012, 07:28:02 PM
Quote from: TXtoNJ on June 19, 2012, 06:29:36 PM
Quote from: YankeesFan on June 19, 2012, 06:16:37 PM
not that it matters now because of I-95 but why wasn't it designated as I-276? NJ seems like it is so anti-interstate.
Think it was because it had no direct connection to any interstate before the addition of turnpike mileage to I-95 north of Exit 6.
Devil's advocate time: so why wasn't I-276 extended up to Exit 7A to end at I-195? It could even have ended at US 206 at Exit 7, or EVEN 130 at Exit 6A. State line makes less sense than a US or I- highway.

The NJ Turnpike spur and mainline down to the spur have even been "secretly" officially designated I-95–but not signed–for some time now.


TXtoNJ

Quote from: Steve on June 19, 2012, 07:28:02 PM
Quote from: TXtoNJ on June 19, 2012, 06:29:36 PM
Quote from: YankeesFan on June 19, 2012, 06:16:37 PM
not that it matters now because of I-95 but why wasn't it designated as I-276? NJ seems like it is so anti-interstate.

Think it was because it had no direct connection to any interstate before the addition of turnpike mileage to I-95 north of Exit 6.
Devil's advocate time: so why wasn't I-276 extended up to Exit 7A to end at I-195? It could even have ended at US 206 at Exit 7, or EVEN 130 at Exit 6A. State line makes less sense than a US or I- highway.

Probably because I-195 was a political compromise that arose later on.

I think I discovered another reason for I-276 not extending into NJ. When originally signed, it was a bypass of I-80S, as I-76 was originally numbered. At this time, it was numbered as I-280. New Jersey already had its I-280 designated up in North Jersey, as far back as 1958. Seeing as it would have made no sense to change the designation of the highway at the state line (to something like I-680), that it had an already-recognizable designation separate from the interstate number (PA Turnpike) that could be easily used in signage, and that the highway was entirely funded by the Turnpike Authority, it makes sense that there would be no numbering.

Later on, numbering the highway to I-276 would have likely been seen as having little benefit to justify the cost of signage and getting AASHTO approval.

Beltway

Quote from: TXtoNJ on June 20, 2012, 07:49:00 PM
I think I discovered another reason for I-276 not extending into NJ. When originally signed, it was a bypass of I-80S, as I-76 was originally numbered. At this time, it was numbered as I-280. New Jersey already had its I-280 designated up in North Jersey, as far back as 1958. Seeing as it would have made no sense to change the designation of the highway at the state line (to something like I-680), that it had an already-recognizable designation separate from the interstate number (PA Turnpike) that could be easily used in signage, and that the highway was entirely funded by the Turnpike Authority, it makes sense that there would be no numbering.

Later on, numbering the highway to I-276 would have likely been seen as having little benefit to justify the cost of signage and getting AASHTO approval.

If the Turnpike had been connected to I-95, it would be a moot point.  I-276 could have ended at I-95 just like I-476 does.
http://www.roadstothefuture.com
http://www.capital-beltway.com

Baloney is a reserved word on the Internet
    (Robert  Coté, 2002)

Hot Rod Hootenanny

Quote from: Beltway on June 20, 2012, 09:32:40 PM
Quote from: TXtoNJ on June 20, 2012, 07:49:00 PM
I think I discovered another reason for I-276 not extending into NJ. When originally signed, it was a bypass of I-80S, as I-76 was originally numbered. At this time, it was numbered as I-280. New Jersey already had its I-280 designated up in North Jersey, as far back as 1958. Seeing as it would have made no sense to change the designation of the highway at the state line (to something like I-680), that it had an already-recognizable designation separate from the interstate number (PA Turnpike) that could be easily used in signage, and that the highway was entirely funded by the Turnpike Authority, it makes sense that there would be no numbering.

Later on, numbering the highway to I-276 would have likely been seen as having little benefit to justify the cost of signage and getting AASHTO approval.

If the Turnpike had been connected to I-95, it would be a moot point.  I-276 could have ended at I-95 just like I-476 does.

Or if New Jersey would have connected I-276 with I-295 or US 130...
Please, don't sue Alex & Andy over what I wrote above

roadman65

Might as well extend it, cause the construction still not started yet after years of planning.  I am beginning to think that I-74 in West Virginia will be built before this simple interchange gets off the ground.
Every day is a winding road, you just got to get used to it.

Sheryl Crowe

HighwayMaster

Here it is, for anyone who need a pic, like me (Doug's pic):



Definitely will be SOUTH I-95 TO I-276.
Life is too short not to have Tim Hortons donuts.

swbrotha100

Quote from: HighwayMaster on June 22, 2012, 08:42:49 PM
Here it is, for anyone who need a pic, like me (Doug's pic):



Definitely will be SOUTH I-95 TO I-276.

I have to say I like the new signage. Hope other parts of the NJ Turnpike upgrade the signage (at least the current/future I-95 section).

KEVIN_224

Considering that the old and ugly green gantry that was in that area previously? It was probably there since the Turnpike opened in the 1950s! 

roadman65

Quote from: KEVIN_224 on June 23, 2012, 12:59:01 PM
Considering that the old and ugly green gantry that was in that area previously? It was probably there since the Turnpike opened in the 1950s! 
Actually I thought that gantry was classic and it is a shame that NJTA is removing it permanently just as the original slant roof toll plazas are being modernized or ramps relocated as in the case of Exit 8
Every day is a winding road, you just got to get used to it.

Sheryl Crowe

YankeesFan

also like new signage...hope they do the rest of the I-95 part as an actual interstate and not with the ugly signs.

cpzilliacus

Quote from: roadman65 on June 23, 2012, 01:07:14 PM
Quote from: KEVIN_224 on June 23, 2012, 12:59:01 PM
Considering that the old and ugly green gantry that was in that area previously? It was probably there since the Turnpike opened in the 1950s! 
Actually I thought that gantry was classic and it is a shame that NJTA is removing it permanently just as the original slant roof toll plazas are being modernized or ramps relocated as in the case of Exit 8

I did not like the sign panels that were on that gantry (they were uninformative and sooo-1950's), but I loved the gantry itself, and in a perfect world, the Turnpike Authority would have either retained that old gantry, or built a new one using the same campy style and installed new, MUTCD-compliant sign panels on it.
Opinions expressed here on AAROADS are strictly personal and mine alone, and do not reflect policies or positions of MWCOG, NCRTPB or their member federal, state, county and municipal governments or any other agency.

roadman65

Quote from: cpzilliacus on June 23, 2012, 05:45:43 PM
Quote from: roadman65 on June 23, 2012, 01:07:14 PM
Quote from: KEVIN_224 on June 23, 2012, 12:59:01 PM
Considering that the old and ugly green gantry that was in that area previously? It was probably there since the Turnpike opened in the 1950s! 
Actually I thought that gantry was classic and it is a shame that NJTA is removing it permanently just as the original slant roof toll plazas are being modernized or ramps relocated as in the case of Exit 8

I did not like the sign panels that were on that gantry (they were uninformative and sooo-1950's), but I loved the gantry itself, and in a perfect world, the Turnpike Authority would have either retained that old gantry, or built a new one using the same campy style and installed new, MUTCD-compliant sign panels on it.
NJDOT did so in Jersey City on WB I-78 on the viaduct leading to the Turnpike.  They copied the 1950's style gantry used at Exit 6 (and on some CA Freeways) and just erected modern sign panels.
Every day is a winding road, you just got to get used to it.

Sheryl Crowe

Michael in Philly

Quote from: HighwayMaster on June 22, 2012, 08:42:49 PM
Here it is, for anyone who need a pic, like me (Doug's pic):



Definitely will be SOUTH I-95 TO I-276.

Hmm.  I was going northbound, so it was a different sign.  As I said, it was a couple of weeks ago at this point so I don't remember in detail, but I don't think there was that sort of blatant empty space for something else:  just a 276 shield in a reasonable position for the only shield on a sign and (I think) "Pa Tpk" under it.  Definitely no "TO," or I wouldn't have asked the question.
RIP Dad 1924-2012.

KEVIN_224

I know that when I went through here with a friend to Wilmington, DE (as the pull-through suggests!) on June 2nd-3rd that the newer on-ramps were being used from Turnpike Extension north to I-95/New Jersey Turnpike north.

BamaZeus

Quote from: roadman65 on June 23, 2012, 01:07:14 PM
Quote from: KEVIN_224 on June 23, 2012, 12:59:01 PM
Considering that the old and ugly green gantry that was in that area previously? It was probably there since the Turnpike opened in the 1950s! 
Actually I thought that gantry was classic and it is a shame that NJTA is removing it permanently just as the original slant roof toll plazas are being modernized or ramps relocated as in the case of Exit 8

I always liked that one as well.  I just like that original Turnpike sign style that you don't get anywhere else in the country, with those funky swerve arrows on the exit gantries, etc
https://maps.google.com/maps?q=jackson+nj&hl=en&ll=40.103565,-74.723468&spn=0.00947,0.016544&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=40.052282,67.763672&t=h&hnear=Jackson,+Ocean,+New+Jersey&z=16&layer=c&cbll=40.10407,-74.722962&panoid=Ms7Es29hRoC9O8SBmkNEKQ&cbp=12,229.14,,0,7.35

Alps

Quote from: roadman65 on June 23, 2012, 06:01:44 PM
Quote from: cpzilliacus on June 23, 2012, 05:45:43 PM
Quote from: roadman65 on June 23, 2012, 01:07:14 PM
Quote from: KEVIN_224 on June 23, 2012, 12:59:01 PM
Considering that the old and ugly green gantry that was in that area previously? It was probably there since the Turnpike opened in the 1950s! 
Actually I thought that gantry was classic and it is a shame that NJTA is removing it permanently just as the original slant roof toll plazas are being modernized or ramps relocated as in the case of Exit 8

I did not like the sign panels that were on that gantry (they were uninformative and sooo-1950's), but I loved the gantry itself, and in a perfect world, the Turnpike Authority would have either retained that old gantry, or built a new one using the same campy style and installed new, MUTCD-compliant sign panels on it.
NJDOT did so in Jersey City on WB I-78 on the viaduct leading to the Turnpike.  They copied the 1950's style gantry used at Exit 6 (and on some CA Freeways) and just erected modern sign panels.
You're 100% wrong. The gantries on I-78 dateD to the same time as the Exit 6 ones. Only two of them are left - Exits 14A and 14B ramps. All of the mainline ones are gone, and don't even pretend to tell me that they look like the originals.

NJRoadfan

I guess US-130 doesn't get any love on the new Exit 6 signs, and shouldn't that be a "TO I-276"?

I still think Baltimore should be the southbound control city for NJ-700. Thats the direction most of the traffic is going anyway. NJDOT just sticks to plain old "Delaware" or "Del Mem Br" on all their signs.

deathtopumpkins

Quote from: NJRoadfan on June 25, 2012, 09:52:20 PM
I guess US-130 doesn't get any love on the new Exit 6 signs, and shouldn't that be a "TO I-276"?

As stated upthread, there IS a "TO" in front of the 276 shield, it was just covered up with the 95 shield.

QuoteI still think Baltimore should be the southbound control city for NJ-700. Thats the direction most of the traffic is going anyway. NJDOT just sticks to plain old "Delaware" or "Del Mem Br" on all their signs.

I have never seen Delaware appear as a control city, and all the new signs feature Camden and then Wilmington if they have a control city at all (some of the new pull throughs retained THRU TRAFFIC). I agree that Baltimore would be a better fit since that is where the vast majority of traffic is going, but the NJTA (not NJDOT, btw) is always one to be different.
Disclaimer: All posts represent my personal opinions and not those of my employer.

Clinched Highways | Counties Visited

Alps

Quote from: deathtopumpkins on June 26, 2012, 07:27:02 AM
Quote from: NJRoadfan on June 25, 2012, 09:52:20 PM
I guess US-130 doesn't get any love on the new Exit 6 signs, and shouldn't that be a "TO I-276"?

As stated upthread, there IS a "TO" in front of the 276 shield, it was just covered up with the 95 shield.

QuoteI still think Baltimore should be the southbound control city for NJ-700. Thats the direction most of the traffic is going anyway. NJDOT just sticks to plain old "Delaware" or "Del Mem Br" on all their signs.

I have never seen Delaware appear as a control city, and all the new signs feature Camden and then Wilmington if they have a control city at all (some of the new pull throughs retained THRU TRAFFIC). I agree that Baltimore would be a better fit since that is where the vast majority of traffic is going, but the NJTA (not NJDOT, btw) is always one to be different.
Wilmington is the next major city, and the only one in Delaware big enough to be signed. The NJTA only wants to sign one city - if they did two, then you could add Baltimore. Also, THRU TRAFFIC is now dead for any new signs.

deathtopumpkins

Quote from: Steve on June 26, 2012, 08:19:25 AM
Quote from: deathtopumpkins on June 26, 2012, 07:27:02 AM
Quote from: NJRoadfan on June 25, 2012, 09:52:20 PM
I guess US-130 doesn't get any love on the new Exit 6 signs, and shouldn't that be a "TO I-276"?

As stated upthread, there IS a "TO" in front of the 276 shield, it was just covered up with the 95 shield.

QuoteI still think Baltimore should be the southbound control city for NJ-700. Thats the direction most of the traffic is going anyway. NJDOT just sticks to plain old "Delaware" or "Del Mem Br" on all their signs.

I have never seen Delaware appear as a control city, and all the new signs feature Camden and then Wilmington if they have a control city at all (some of the new pull throughs retained THRU TRAFFIC). I agree that Baltimore would be a better fit since that is where the vast majority of traffic is going, but the NJTA (not NJDOT, btw) is always one to be different.
Wilmington is the next major city, and the only one in Delaware big enough to be signed. The NJTA only wants to sign one city - if they did two, then you could add Baltimore. Also, THRU TRAFFIC is now dead for any new signs.

Are you sure? I swear I've seen THRU TRAFFIC used in conjunction with a NJTP shield on a new pull-through.
Disclaimer: All posts represent my personal opinions and not those of my employer.

Clinched Highways | Counties Visited



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.