News:

While the Forum is up and running, there are still thousands of guests (bots). Downtime may occur as a result.
- Alex

Main Menu

Highway Conspiracy Theories

Started by Max Rockatansky, March 10, 2025, 11:48:09 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

thspfc

Quote from: Henry on March 10, 2025, 10:12:01 PMThat I-80 is the "real" longest 2di, because the Chicago Skyway on I-90 does not count, thus breaking it into two separate sections.
Genuine question, what makes the Skyway different from other toll roads?


thenetwork

Quote from: Max Rockatansky on March 10, 2025, 11:48:09 AMMy wife just introduced me to this concept via a conspiracy theory about Belmont Subway in Fresno.  Said underpass structure was completed in 1932 and once carried US 99 to the Belmont Traffic Circle (the first such circle in California incidentally).  Apparently there is a social media video going around claiming a vampire lives in Belmont Subway.  The video claims that the High Speed Rail Authority Authority is demolishing the structure to kill and/or entomb the alleged vampire. 

FWIW Belmont Subway was part of the Fresno Road Meet in 2023.  To my knowledge there was no vampire related incursions.

Edit:  My investigator found the Belmont Subway Vampire video for me.

https://www.tiktok.com/@witchdarktales/video/7310886729601322270?_t=ZT-8uZjjCOKMBC&_r=1

Whew! I'm glad SOMEBODY came up to bat to find the video...

TheHighwayMan3561

Quote from: thspfc on March 20, 2025, 11:58:13 AM
Quote from: Henry on March 10, 2025, 10:12:01 PMThat I-80 is the "real" longest 2di, because the Chicago Skyway on I-90 does not count, thus breaking it into two separate sections.
Genuine question, what makes the Skyway different from other toll roads?

The alleged problem that led to the "TO I-90" nonsense was that IDOT came to believe the Skyway was never formally submitted as an Interstate highway and thus was never approved to be part of I-90. Even though IDOT themselves still believed and worked under the assumption it was, in fact, still I-90 for that period they pretended it was not.

US20IL64

Skyway was in line with I-94/IN Toll Road for a few years, then got swapped with Borman/Calumet/Bishop Ford.

Henry

Quote from: TheHighwayMan3561 on March 20, 2025, 12:27:02 PM
Quote from: thspfc on March 20, 2025, 11:58:13 AM
Quote from: Henry on March 10, 2025, 10:12:01 PMThat I-80 is the "real" longest 2di, because the Chicago Skyway on I-90 does not count, thus breaking it into two separate sections.
Genuine question, what makes the Skyway different from other toll roads?

The alleged problem that led to the "TO I-90" nonsense was that IDOT came to believe the Skyway was never formally submitted as an Interstate highway and thus was never approved to be part of I-90. Even though IDOT themselves still believed and worked under the assumption it was, in fact, still I-90 for that period they pretended it was not.
IDOT had nothing to do with the Skyway, that was all the City of Chicago's thinking.
Go Cubs Go! Go Cubs Go! Hey Chicago, what do you say? The Cubs are gonna win today!

Molandfreak

Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 05, 2023, 08:24:57 PMAASHTO attributes 28.5% of highway inventory shrink to bad road fan social media posts.

oscar

While Interstate H-3 was being built through the Halawa Valley north of Honolulu, there were reports of mysterious things happening to construction equipment, due to a "hewa" (curse) on the highway based on its proximity to native Hawaiian sacred sites. However, all the funny stuff went away after H-3 was completed, along with its sophisticated accident monitoring system due to its relatively remote location.
my Hot Springs and Highways pages, with links to my roads sites:
http://www.alaskaroads.com/home.html

english si

Somehow the UK motorway network is growing despite concrete not being poured.

The length of the network has gone up by 82 miles in the last decade, but we've only built 24.

This is due to more accurate surveying - but unlike Louis XIV's attempt to survey France (the results of which he declared to the surveyors that they lost him more than land than all his enemies) - it gives a larger number than previously thought. And with complaints that we're not building the infrastructure for our growing population, that's politically advantageous...

https://x.com/MichaelDnes1/status/1903357970492117018

Quillz

Original CA 13 being renumbered to CA 17. Superstition? Can't find any reason for why it was changed. The original number made sense  as it  conformed to the 1934 numbering logic. 

Max Rockatansky

I've never found the reason either.  There was a handful of changes to that 1934 scheme that happened before signage hit the field.  I'm still convinced 740 was being held in reserve for a US Route corridor.

Quillz

Quote from: Max Rockatansky on May 04, 2025, 05:45:20 PMI've never found the reason either.  There was a handful of changes to that 1934 scheme that happened before signage hit the field.  I'm still convinced 740 was being held in reserve for a US Route corridor.
440 was temporary. Original 44 likely already known it was getting upgraded to US 299. So 440 was likely for the rerouting. But in case plans changed, the 440 was still a fallback. 

But nothing like that for original 13. 

Max Rockatansky

Quote from: Quillz on May 04, 2025, 05:58:17 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on May 04, 2025, 05:45:20 PMI've never found the reason either.  There was a handful of changes to that 1934 scheme that happened before signage hit the field.  I'm still convinced 740 was being held in reserve for a US Route corridor.
440 was temporary. Original 44 likely already known it was getting upgraded to US 299. So 440 was likely for the rerouting. But in case plans changed, the 440 was still a fallback.

But nothing like that for original 13.

It is amusing that 13 ended up being in the same general area eventually via the Warren Freeway.

Quillz

Quote from: Max Rockatansky on May 04, 2025, 06:01:54 PM
Quote from: Quillz on May 04, 2025, 05:58:17 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on May 04, 2025, 05:45:20 PMI've never found the reason either.  There was a handful of changes to that 1934 scheme that happened before signage hit the field.  I'm still convinced 740 was being held in reserve for a US Route corridor.
440 was temporary. Original 44 likely already known it was getting upgraded to US 299. So 440 was likely for the rerouting. But in case plans changed, the 440 was still a fallback.

But nothing like that for original 13.

It is amusing that 13 ended up being in the same general area eventually via the Warren Freeway.
Which is why I'm curious if superstition had anything to do with the renumbering. 

LilianaUwU

There are so many conspiracy theories NUMTOTs love to share about cars that I would need days to compile them all.
"Volcano with no fire... Not volcano... Just mountain."
—Mr. Thwomp

My pronouns are she/her. Also, I'm an admin on the AARoads Wiki.

Quillz

Quote from: Henry on March 10, 2025, 10:12:01 PMThat I-80 is the "real" longest 2di, because the Chicago Skyway on I-90 does not count, thus breaking it into two separate sections.
This is actually true of both CA-1 and US-101. The Golden Gate Bridge is not officially part of either, as it's part of the park system (IIRC). So US-101 officially has two segments: south of the bridge and north of the bridge.

Quillz

Quote from: PColumbus73 on March 13, 2025, 10:04:58 PMThis might fall into rumor or conspiracy theory, but I heard from somewhere that part of the reason SC 31 / Carolina Bays Pkwy doesn't connect to US 17 was that Burroughs & Chapin, who own a ton of properties in the Myrtle Beach area, were afraid it would draw business away from Myrtle Beach. Or didn't want to lose business, something to that effect.
One of the funny things is people are very hypocritical. If you want to build a bypass around a town, you'll get complaints that the bypass will take away traffic and business. If you don't build a bypass around a town, you'll get complaints that it will bring unwanted traffic (and the proverbial "drugs & crime!") to the town. But build it anyway, then build the bypass later, and watch those same people change their tune.

Rothman

Quote from: Quillz on May 07, 2025, 04:53:36 PM
Quote from: Henry on March 10, 2025, 10:12:01 PMThat I-80 is the "real" longest 2di, because the Chicago Skyway on I-90 does not count, thus breaking it into two separate sections.
This is actually true of both CA-1 and US-101. The Golden Gate Bridge is not officially part of either, as it's part of the park system (IIRC). So US-101 officially has two segments: south of the bridge and north of the bridge.

Golden Gate is its own authority/district.  Not sure how that would prevent the route designations from going across the bridge.  Certainly doesn't on any other public authority-owned bridge in the country.
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position(s) of NYSDOT.

Quillz

Quote from: Rothman on May 07, 2025, 11:04:41 PM
Quote from: Quillz on May 07, 2025, 04:53:36 PM
Quote from: Henry on March 10, 2025, 10:12:01 PMThat I-80 is the "real" longest 2di, because the Chicago Skyway on I-90 does not count, thus breaking it into two separate sections.
This is actually true of both CA-1 and US-101. The Golden Gate Bridge is not officially part of either, as it's part of the park system (IIRC). So US-101 officially has two segments: south of the bridge and north of the bridge.

Golden Gate is its own authority/district.  Not sure how that would prevent the route designations from going across the bridge.  Certainly doesn't on any other public authority-owned bridge in the country.
It's considered two discontinuous segments  in California. The bridge is not assigned to either route. 

NE2

US 101 is certainly signed on the bridge, so whether or not Caltrans considers it to be part of Route 101 is as relevant as whether Caltrans considers US 395 in Nevada to be part of Route 395.
pre-1945 Florida route log

I accept and respect your identity as long as it's not dumb shit like "identifying as a vaccinated attack helicopter".

Rothman

Quote from: Quillz on May 07, 2025, 11:08:12 PM
Quote from: Rothman on May 07, 2025, 11:04:41 PM
Quote from: Quillz on May 07, 2025, 04:53:36 PM
Quote from: Henry on March 10, 2025, 10:12:01 PMThat I-80 is the "real" longest 2di, because the Chicago Skyway on I-90 does not count, thus breaking it into two separate sections.
This is actually true of both CA-1 and US-101. The Golden Gate Bridge is not officially part of either, as it's part of the park system (IIRC). So US-101 officially has two segments: south of the bridge and north of the bridge.

Golden Gate is its own authority/district.  Not sure how that would prevent the route designations from going across the bridge.  Certainly doesn't on any other public authority-owned bridge in the country.
It's considered two discontinuous segments  in California. The bridge is not assigned to either route. 

Seems we've come across another conspiracy theory.
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position(s) of NYSDOT.

Max Rockatansky

Quote from: Rothman on May 07, 2025, 11:20:32 PM
Quote from: Quillz on May 07, 2025, 11:08:12 PM
Quote from: Rothman on May 07, 2025, 11:04:41 PM
Quote from: Quillz on May 07, 2025, 04:53:36 PM
Quote from: Henry on March 10, 2025, 10:12:01 PMThat I-80 is the "real" longest 2di, because the Chicago Skyway on I-90 does not count, thus breaking it into two separate sections.
This is actually true of both CA-1 and US-101. The Golden Gate Bridge is not officially part of either, as it's part of the park system (IIRC). So US-101 officially has two segments: south of the bridge and north of the bridge.

Golden Gate is its own authority/district.  Not sure how that would prevent the route designations from going across the bridge.  Certainly doesn't on any other public authority-owned bridge in the country.
It's considered two discontinuous segments  in California. The bridge is not assigned to either route. 

Seems we've come across another conspiracy theory.

Never mind the fact that both highways have had signage on the bridge.  AASHTO also overtly recognized the Golden Gate Bridge as part of US 101.

Here is the long form take I did on this:

https://www.gribblenation.org/2021/11/the-legislative-route-gaps-of-us-route.html?m=1

Quillz

Quote from: Rothman on May 07, 2025, 11:20:32 PM
Quote from: Quillz on May 07, 2025, 11:08:12 PM
Quote from: Rothman on May 07, 2025, 11:04:41 PM
Quote from: Quillz on May 07, 2025, 04:53:36 PM
Quote from: Henry on March 10, 2025, 10:12:01 PMThat I-80 is the "real" longest 2di, because the Chicago Skyway on I-90 does not count, thus breaking it into two separate sections.
This is actually true of both CA-1 and US-101. The Golden Gate Bridge is not officially part of either, as it's part of the park system (IIRC). So US-101 officially has two segments: south of the bridge and north of the bridge.

Golden Gate is its own authority/district.  Not sure how that would prevent the route designations from going across the bridge.  Certainly doesn't on any other public authority-owned bridge in the country.
It's considered two discontinuous segments  in California. The bridge is not assigned to either route. 

Seems we've come across another conspiracy theory.
Its just an interesting quirk in how the route is maintained. It's discontinuous but fully constructed and signed. 

Rothman

Quote from: Quillz on May 08, 2025, 01:46:08 AM
Quote from: Rothman on May 07, 2025, 11:20:32 PM
Quote from: Quillz on May 07, 2025, 11:08:12 PM
Quote from: Rothman on May 07, 2025, 11:04:41 PM
Quote from: Quillz on May 07, 2025, 04:53:36 PM
Quote from: Henry on March 10, 2025, 10:12:01 PMThat I-80 is the "real" longest 2di, because the Chicago Skyway on I-90 does not count, thus breaking it into two separate sections.
This is actually true of both CA-1 and US-101. The Golden Gate Bridge is not officially part of either, as it's part of the park system (IIRC). So US-101 officially has two segments: south of the bridge and north of the bridge.

Golden Gate is its own authority/district.  Not sure how that would prevent the route designations from going across the bridge.  Certainly doesn't on any other public authority-owned bridge in the country.
It's considered two discontinuous segments  in California. The bridge is not assigned to either route. 

Seems we've come across another conspiracy theory.
Its just an interesting quirk in how the route is maintained. It's discontinuous but fully constructed and signed.

You need to read Max's post.
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position(s) of NYSDOT.

vdeane

Quote from: Quillz on May 07, 2025, 11:08:12 PM
Quote from: Rothman on May 07, 2025, 11:04:41 PM
Quote from: Quillz on May 07, 2025, 04:53:36 PM
Quote from: Henry on March 10, 2025, 10:12:01 PMThat I-80 is the "real" longest 2di, because the Chicago Skyway on I-90 does not count, thus breaking it into two separate sections.
This is actually true of both CA-1 and US-101. The Golden Gate Bridge is not officially part of either, as it's part of the park system (IIRC). So US-101 officially has two segments: south of the bridge and north of the bridge.

Golden Gate is its own authority/district.  Not sure how that would prevent the route designations from going across the bridge.  Certainly doesn't on any other public authority-owned bridge in the country.
It's considered two discontinuous segments  in California. The bridge is not assigned to either route. 
Given that it's signed and both FHWA and AASHTO recognize US 101 on the bridge, I'm inclined to consider this to have more in common with the Chicago Skyway (where the local DOT made an oddball judgement that didn't reflect reality) than Yellowstone (where the routes actually don't exist).
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

ElishaGOtis

Quote from: thenetwork on March 20, 2025, 12:01:03 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on March 10, 2025, 11:48:09 AMMy wife just introduced me to this concept via a conspiracy theory about Belmont Subway in Fresno.  Said underpass structure was completed in 1932 and once carried US 99 to the Belmont Traffic Circle (the first such circle in California incidentally).  Apparently there is a social media video going around claiming a vampire lives in Belmont Subway.  The video claims that the High Speed Rail Authority Authority is demolishing the structure to kill and/or entomb the alleged vampire. 

FWIW Belmont Subway was part of the Fresno Road Meet in 2023.  To my knowledge there was no vampire related incursions.

Edit:  My investigator found the Belmont Subway Vampire video for me.

https://www.tiktok.com/@witchdarktales/video/7310886729601322270?_t=ZT-8uZjjCOKMBC&_r=1

Whew! I'm glad SOMEBODY came up to bat to find the video...

Ironically the circle is currently being reconstructed for the CA HSR project...

Quote from: Quillz on May 04, 2025, 06:11:54 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on May 04, 2025, 06:01:54 PM
Quote from: Quillz on May 04, 2025, 05:58:17 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on May 04, 2025, 05:45:20 PMI've never found the reason either.  There was a handful of changes to that 1934 scheme that happened before signage hit the field.  I'm still convinced 740 was being held in reserve for a US Route corridor.
440 was temporary. Original 44 likely already known it was getting upgraded to US 299. So 440 was likely for the rerouting. But in case plans changed, the 440 was still a fallback.

But nothing like that for original 13.

It is amusing that 13 ended up being in the same general area eventually via the Warren Freeway.
Which is why I'm curious if superstition had anything to do with the renumbering.

Wasn't I-11 chosen instead of I-13 for this very reason, especially considering Las Vegas was in the mix?
I can drive 55 ONLY when it makes sense.

NOTE: Opinions expressed here on AARoads are solely my own and do not represent or reflect the statements, opinions, or decisions of any agency. Any official information I share will be quoted from another source.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.